we both included

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "we both included" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to convey that both parties contributed to something, but it lacks clarity and proper grammatical structure. Example: "In the final report, we both included our findings and recommendations."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

We both included short term responses (week 12) and longer term responses (week 24 and 48).

Plosone

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

▪ Strength that we both include inpatients and outpatients because of the nature of COPD.

BMJ Open

We did calculations both including and excluding the unlinked deaths.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Therefore, we performed analyses both including and excluding subjects with extreme values.

BMC Psychiatry

We undertook analyses both including and excluding women who met clinical criteria for GDM.

Diabetologia

Additionally, we fitted models where we included both fat (total or subtypes) and weight gain.

BMC Women's Health

We present the results both including and excluding other covariates.

IZA Journal of Labor Policy

We've included both the lawsuit and the employment agreement documents provided by Uber.

TechCrunch

Nevertheless, here we have included both the originals and the ten alternates.

Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

We therefore included both measures of genetic diversity.

Plosone

The deletion we designed included both ORFs.

Biotechnology for Biofuels

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

For clarity and grammatical correctness, rephrase "we both included" as "we included together" or "both of us included."

Common error

Avoid using "both" when "we" already implies two individuals. Instead of "we both included", consider "we included" for a more concise and grammatically sound sentence.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we both included" functions as a statement of action, indicating that two individuals jointly participated in including something. However, according to Ludwig AI, this specific phrasing is not grammatically correct, suggesting that it might be perceived as awkward or redundant. There is one instance of "we both included" where is used in the correct form.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "we both included" appears in some contexts, especially in scientific writing, Ludwig AI flags it as grammatically incorrect. For improved clarity and precision, consider using alternatives such as "we included together" or "both of us included". This ensures that your writing is grammatically sound and effectively conveys your intended meaning. The usage analysis reveals that although the expression appears in academic and scientific articles, which might give it a semblance of authority, it should be carefully considered in formal writing, where clarity and grammatical correctness are paramount.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

we included together

Emphasizes joint action in including something.

both of us included

Highlights that 'both of us' were involved in the inclusion.

we jointly included

Implies a shared inclusion with a slightly more formal tone.

we collectively included

Suggests the inclusion was a combined effort.

we both were inclusive of

Shifts focus to being 'inclusive' rather than simply including, implying a broader scope.

we incorporated equally

Highlights equal contribution and incorporation.

we jointly considered

Shifts the action to 'considering' together, not just including.

we mutually incorporated

Emphasizes a mutual agreement in the incorporation.

together, we added

Simplified version, focusing on the addition aspect.

each of us made sure to include

Focuses on individual responsibility in ensuring inclusion.

FAQs

How can I correctly use "we both included" in a sentence?

While "we both included" isn't standard English, you can revise it to "we included together" or "both of us included" to convey the same meaning with better grammar.

What's a more grammatically correct alternative to "we both included"?

Consider using alternatives like "we included together" or "both of us included" for clearer communication.

Is "we both included" considered redundant?

Yes, using "both" with "we" can be redundant because "we" already implies two individuals. It's more concise to say "we included".

Can "we both included" be used in formal writing?

It's best to avoid "we both included" in formal writing. Opt for more precise and grammatically correct alternatives such as "we jointly included" or "we collectively included."