Your English writing platform
Discover Ludwig'We at' is not technically correct or usable in written English, as it does not form a complete sentence
To use it, you would need to add more information to complete the thought. For example, "We at XYZ company are excited to announce our new product!"
Exact(56)
"Are we at loggerheads?
"Are we at the point of implosion?
"Are we at peace?" Yip Harburg asked.
Who are we at war with?
Basically, are we at the right address?
Are we at similar risk today?
We at Bennington will fiercely miss her.
Were we at home?
Similar(3)
We are at war.
"We looked at everyone.
"We started at zero".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com