Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(7)
We assessed studies spanning four decades and published in any language.
We assessed studies for eligibility, extracted data, and subsequently pooled the data.
In our meta-analysis we assessed studies of dry-cleaning (and laundry) workers to gain insight into the potential association between exposure to tetrachloroethylene and bladder cancer risk.
We assessed studies according to the risk of bias for each important outcome within included trials, including adequacy of generation of the allocation sequence, allocation concealment, blinding and outcome reporting.
We assessed studies that included patients with a chronic infection of a hip arthroplasty treated with either one-stage or two-stage revision and with available data on occurrence of reinfections.
We assessed studies' quality on the basis of adequate adjustment for potential confounders (at least six of seven factors: age, sex, hypertension or systolic blood pressure or antihypertensive drug, body mass index or other measure of overweight/obesity, physical activity, cholesterol concentration or statin use, and smoking).
Similar(53)
We assessed study quality and established a quality assessment scale according to the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale (Supplementary Table 1).
We assessed study quality with the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale.
We assessed study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale (NOS) for case-control studies, as recommended by Cochrane collaboration.
We assessed study characteristics.
Additionally, we assessed study quality using the Jadad scale.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com