Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
we ascertained with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "we ascertained with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used when indicating that information was confirmed or verified in conjunction with someone or something, but it requires a more specific context to be clear. Example: "After thorough investigation, we ascertained with the experts that the data was accurate."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
We used a family we ascertained with generalized renal failure as an example to illustrate the selection procedure.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
We ascertained this with information from patients, carers, case managers, clinicians, and clinical records.
Science
We ascertained patients with previous benign breast disease recorded at least more than 1 year before the index date.
Science
We ascertained patients with gout and dementia covering vascular and non-vascular (including Alzheimer's) subtypes using International Classification of Diseases Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD9-CM) codes.
We must point out, however, that we ascertained satisfaction with NBS education only among those who recalled receiving such education (because we were interested in understanding the specific elements of education that were important predictors of satisfaction); therefore, our descriptive findings are likely to be an overestimate of the overall satisfaction levels in the population.
Science
We ascertained subjects with LADA and type 2 diabetes from the LADA China multicenter study (46 hospitals throughout China contributed); type 1 diabetes, defined by WHO criteria (4), from the Type 1 Diabetes Collaboration Net (18 hospitals in Hunan Province); and normal subjects were screened by 75-g oral glucose tolerance test from 5,000 Chinese in a population-based study.
Science
We ascertained 52 individuals with FSGS from 21 families in whom disease segregation was compatible with an autosomal dominant pattern.
Science
Additionally, we ascertained current practice with respect to Ureaplasma detection in preterm neonates in the UK.
Science
In fact, we ascertained sublinear dependences with the slopes of 0.9 and 0.3 for I 1 and I 2 components, respectively.
Science
We ascertained incident fractures with triannual questionnaires delivered by mail or telephone.
Science
We ascertained 393 patients with cervical cancer between October, 2008 and September, 2011 at the Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When aiming for clarity, specify the method or source used for verification. Instead of "we ascertained with", use phrases like "we confirmed using data from" or "we verified through expert consultation."
Common error
Avoid using "with" directly after "ascertained" unless you are specifying what or whom you consulted to confirm the information. Typically, a more direct phrasing, such as "we ascertained [the information] using [method]", provides better clarity.
Source & Trust
78%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "we ascertained with" is typically used to describe the process of finding something out for certain. The intended function is to express confirmation or verification, but as noted by Ludwig, the phrasing is not grammatically correct and may require adjustment for clarity.
Frequent in
Science
80%
News & Media
20%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "we ascertained with" is considered grammatically questionable in standard English, as noted by Ludwig AI. Although the intent is to convey confirmation or verification, it's better to use more direct and clear phrasing. Alternatives such as "we confirmed using" or "we verified through" are recommended. The phrase is most commonly found in science and news contexts. Use this knowledge to improve the correctness and clarity of your writing.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
we confirmed using
Replaces "ascertained" with "confirmed" and specifies the means of confirmation, implying a direct method.
we verified through
Uses "verified" to suggest validation, highlighting the process by which the information was checked.
we determined by means of
Emphasizes the methodology used to reach a conclusion, offering a more formal tone.
we established via
Suggests a firm conclusion based on a specific medium or method.
we found out using
Informal alternative that indicates discovery through a specified method.
we learned from
Focuses on the source of the information rather than the method of ascertainment.
we deduced from
Indicates that the information was inferred from available data.
we gathered from
Implies collecting information from various sources to form a conclusion.
we concluded based on
Highlights the conclusion and the foundation upon which it was based.
we understood through
Suggests gaining comprehension via a particular process or source.
FAQs
What does "we ascertained" mean?
"We ascertained" means we discovered or determined something, often through investigation. It implies a degree of certainty in the finding.
How can I rephrase "we ascertained with" for better clarity?
To improve clarity, use phrases like "we confirmed using", "we verified through", or "we determined by means of". These alternatives more directly express the method or source of verification.
Is "we ascertained with" grammatically correct?
According to Ludwig, the phrase "we ascertained with" is generally considered incorrect in standard English. It's better to use alternatives that more clearly specify how something was determined.
What's the difference between "we ascertained" and "we confirmed"?
"We ascertained" implies a process of discovery or determination, while "we confirmed" suggests verifying something already suspected or proposed. Consider using alternatives like "we verified" or "we determined" for precision.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
78%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested