we are allowed to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "we are allowed to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to express permission or the ability to do something. Example: "In this project, we are allowed to use any resources we find helpful."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

We are allowed to expect more.

The New Yorker

We are allowed to do one thing.

The Guardian - Film

But we are allowed to dream, yes?

The New York Times - Travel

"We are allowed to worship freely.

The Guardian

Is there anything we are allowed to know?

The Guardian - Music

We are allowed to talk about other things.

The Guardian - Opinion

"It's the one thing we are allowed to do".

The New York Times - Books

We are allowed to wash our hair once a week.

The Guardian - Music

Yes, as a democracy we are allowed to disagree.

The Guardian - Opinion

We are allowed to know the thoughts of several characters.

The Guardian - Books

A half-hour later, we are allowed to proceed.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "we are allowed to" when indicating that permission or authorization has been granted for a specific action. Ensure the context clearly defines who is granting the permission.

Common error

Avoid using "we are allowed to" when the ability to perform an action stems from personal skill or inherent capability, rather than external permission. In such cases, use "we are able to" or "we can" instead.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we are allowed to" functions as a modal phrase expressing permission or authorization. It indicates that the speaker and others included in "we" have been granted the right or ability to perform a certain action. Ludwig AI confirms the grammatical correctness and widespread use of this phrase.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "we are allowed to" is a grammatically correct and very common expression used to indicate permission or authorization. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase follows standard grammatical rules. Analysis of its usage across different sources reveals its presence in diverse contexts, including news, science, and business. While primarily neutral in register, its specific tone can vary depending on the source and the context. As demonstrated by numerous examples, this phrase serves to inform, explain, or justify actions within established guidelines. Alternatives such as "we have permission to" or "we are permitted to" can be used to fine-tune the expression's formality or emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

we have permission to

Emphasizes that permission has been granted by an external authority.

we are permitted to

A more formal way of expressing permission.

we are authorized to

Indicates official or legal authorization.

we are entitled to

Suggests a right or claim to something.

we are able to

Focuses on capability rather than permission.

we can

A simpler and more direct way of expressing ability or permission.

it is permissible for us to

A very formal and somewhat indirect way of granting permission.

we have the right to

Highlights the existence of a legal or moral right.

we are free to

Indicates a lack of restriction or obligation.

we are in a position to

Implies having the necessary resources or circumstances to do something.

FAQs

What can I say instead of "we are allowed to"?

You can use alternatives like "we have permission to", "we are permitted to", or "we are authorized to" depending on the context.

How to use "we are allowed to" in a sentence?

Use "we are allowed to" to indicate that permission has been given for a particular action. For example, "In this project, we are allowed to use any resources we find helpful".

Which is correct, "we are allowed to" or "we are able to"?

Both phrases are correct, but they have different meanings. "We are allowed to" implies permission, while "we are able to" implies capability.

What's the difference between "we are allowed to" and "we are supposed to"?

"We are allowed to" indicates permission, whereas "we are supposed to" suggests an obligation or expectation, not necessarily explicit permission.