Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
we am
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "we am" is not correct in English and cannot be used in written English.
It is a grammatical error as "we" is a plural subject and should be paired with "are" instead of "am." Example: "We am excited to announce our new project." (should be "We are excited...")
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
News & Media
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
3 human-written examples
But which "we" am I using here?
News & Media
I hope this year we can do it in the same way but we am sure we are going find a very tough team in their home because they always play very strong, especially in aerial duels".
News & Media
We am assuming here that 'gnomes' and 'unicorns' don't refer to anything.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
"We were".
News & Media
We are who we are".
News & Media
"We believed we were.
News & Media
We are — where are we?
News & Media
We were, we told him.
News & Media
Because we are what we are.
News & Media
When we are secure, we are successful.
News & Media
"So we are where we are".
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Always use "we are" or "we're" instead of "we am" in standard English writing and speech. This ensures grammatical correctness and clarity.
Common error
Avoid using "we am" due to subject-verb disagreement. "We" is a plural pronoun, and therefore requires the plural form of the verb "to be", which is "are".
Source & Trust
94%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "we am" is intended to function as a subject and verb, expressing a state of being or action performed by a group. However, it fails to do so grammatically, as indicated by Ludwig AI. The correct form is "we are" or "we're".
Frequent in
News & Media
67%
Science
33%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "we am" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in standard English. The correct form is "we are" or the contraction "we're". While Ludwig AI identifies a few instances in sources like The Guardian and The New York Times, these are likely errors or examples of non-standard usage. Always prioritize grammatical correctness to ensure clarity and credibility in your writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
we are
Corrects the grammatical error by using the proper conjugation of "to be" with the plural pronoun "we".
we're
A contraction of "we are", offering a more concise and informal alternative.
we have
Shifts the focus to possession or experience, using "have" instead of "to be".
we will
Expresses future intention or action.
we feel
Indicates an emotional state or sentiment.
we think
Suggests an opinion or belief.
we believe
Expresses a conviction or strong opinion.
we understand
Indicates comprehension or awareness.
we know
Expresses certainty or knowledge.
we assume
Indicates a presumption or supposition.
FAQs
What is the correct way to use "we am" in a sentence?
Is "we am" ever correct in English?
No, "we am" is not considered correct in standard English. It's a common error to use it in place of "we are".
What can I say instead of "we am"?
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
94%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested