Suggestions(1)
Exact(4)
Consequently, we accepted studies that considered a considerable number of patients with moderate aplastic anemia or unknown disease severity.
We accepted studies which included women of any race, parity, age, body weight or other socio-demographic characteristics.
To estimate the effect of the quality of the reference standard, we accepted studies using microscopy on a single stool sample (lower-quality reference standard) and studies performing microscopy on multiple stool samples (higher-quality reference standard).
We therefore included studies that use all of these concentration techniques, and to estimate the effect of the quality of the reference standard, we accepted studies using microscopy on a single urine sample (lower-quality reference standard) and studies performing microscopy on multiple urine samples (higher-quality reference standard).
Similar(56)
We accepted study authors' definitions of what constituted a diabetic foot ulcer and included trials that recruited patients with any type of diabetic foot ulcer.
We accept studies using a range of methodologies including computations, behavioral, cognitive and neural systems investigations, and a broad range of format including full research articles, brief communications and review/opinion or correspondence articles.
Third, to eliminate any effects of seasonality on our results, we only accepted studies that provided data for an entire year or at least the entire growing season for annual producers.
For studies examining potential biomarkers for RA diagnosis, we also accepted studies that used patients with osteoarthritis as the control group, as this was a common practice among these studies.
In the absence of either a quantitative or qualitative pentachlorophenol measure, we also accepted studies that included an assessment of chlorophenol exposure and additional information on specific jobs that would have likely used pentachlorophenol rather than other chlorophenols.
Thus, as we already expected, health care and life sciences was the most cited application domain among the literature accepted studies.
With many experimental drugs, the agency demands trials with thousands of patients, while for cancer, it has accepted studies with a few dozen.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com