Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
we've not found
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesAlternative expressions(20)
we have yet to find
we have not found
we haven't discovered
we haven't come across
it remains to be seen
we have yet to explore
the matter is under consideration
we have yet to discover
we have yet to decide
we have yet to achieve
we have yet to understand
a decision is pending
we have not encountered
we have yet to see
we have never encountered
we have not experienced
we have not faced
we are unfamiliar with
we haven't encountered
we haven't seen
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
11 human-written examples
Here, we've not found that form.
News & Media
"So far we've not found anything approaching a magic bullet to increase adherence," he said.
News & Media
We've not found anywhere else in the cosmos that is a perfect haven for life".
News & Media
"We've not found it [breaches] before, not found it since," he added.
News & Media
"We've not found a Russian distributor yet, but it is enormously important for this film to be shown in Russia if Polish-Russian relations in the 21st century are to be based in truth, not lies.
News & Media
"Here, we've not found that form, so we've got to be disappointed.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
49 human-written examples
And we cannot destroy what we have not found.
"But we have not found our ultimate speed.
News & Media
We have not found a conflict of interest".
News & Media
There are still several problems we have not found solutions over decades/centuries.
We have not found any modifiable risk factors which influence their growth pattern.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
This construction is particularly effective in British English journalism to maintain a rhythmic flow in sentences.
Common error
Do not use "we've not found" with specific past time markers like 'yesterday' or 'last week'. The present perfect requires a time period that continues to the present moment. Instead, use the simple past if a specific time is mentioned.
Source & Trust
92%
Authority and reliability
4.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "we've not found" serves as a negative present perfect construction. It combines the first-person plural pronoun 'we' with a contracted auxiliary 'have' and the negative particle 'not', followed by the past participle 'found'. According to "Ludwig", this structure is used to indicate a state of non-discovery that exists from the past up until the present moment.
Frequent in
News & Media
45%
Science
35%
Academia
20%
Less common in
Social Media
5%
Wiki
3%
Reference
2%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In conclusion, "we've not found" is a standard and effective way to communicate the absence of a result. "Ludwig" identifies it as a common phrase in high-tier journalism and scientific literature. While it is synonymous with "we haven't found", it is often chosen for its specific rhythmic qualities in British English or to place a clearer emphasis on the negative 'not'. Writers should feel confident using this phrase in professional contexts, provided they do not pair it with specific past-time markers that would require the simple past tense.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
we haven't found
Shifts the contraction to the negative auxiliary verb, common in American English.
we have not found
Removes the contraction for a more formal and emphatic tone.
we have yet to find
Adds an expectation that a discovery might happen in the future.
we've found nothing
Rephrases by attaching the negation to the object rather than the verb.
we haven't located
Uses a more specific verb related to physical position or data retrieval.
we haven't discovered
Focuses on the act of revelation or scientific breakthrough.
we are yet to find
Changes the auxiliary to indicate a current state of lack.
we haven't identified
Suggests a technical or formal classification process.
we failed to find
Implies a past effort that was specifically unsuccessful.
we haven't come across
Uses a phrasal verb for a more conversational and informal tone.
FAQs
What can I say instead of "we've not found"?
You can use alternatives like "we haven't found", "we have yet to find" or "we have not discovered" depending on the context.
Is "we've not found" grammatically correct?
Yes, it is a perfectly correct contraction of the present perfect negative. While "we haven't found" is more common in American English, "we've not found" is frequently seen in high-quality British sources like "The Guardian".
What is the difference between "we've not found" and "we haven't found"?
There is no semantic difference. The distinction is primarily stylistic and regional. "we haven't found" is the most standard contraction globally, while "we've not found" places slightly more emphasis on the word 'not'.
Can I use "we've not found" in a scientific paper?
While correct, scientific papers often prefer the uncontracted "we have not found" to maintain a formal tone, though "Ludwig" examples show that contractions appear occasionally in scientific reporting.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
92%
Authority and reliability
4.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested