Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
The peak wavelength is between 840 and 855 nm, which is significantly redshifted with respect to bulk GaAs band edge emission (816 nm) at 10 K.
It can also be used to enhance scattering in surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) where it was reported that highest enhancement is achieved when LSPR peak wavelength is between the wavelength of the excitation light source and that of the chosen Raman-scattered photon wavelength [14].
This is because light is a wave, and the diffraction limit dictates that you can't focus a wave on a point smaller than about half its wavelength, and visible light's wavelength is between about 400 and 650 nanometers.
According to the ANSI safety standard, when the optical wavelength is between 1.05 µm and 1.40 µm and pulse duration is between 10−9 s and 50 × 10−6 s, the MPESP = 5.0CC CE × 10−6 J/cm = 1.11 × 10−5 J/cm.
Similar(56)
For a 100-nm single AuNP in water, the peak resonance wavelength was between 550 and 600 nm (first row of Figure 8), consistent with the Mie calculation of 580 nm.
The range of the detecting wavelength was between 260 and 360 nm.
For large follicles the absorbance wavelength was between 626 and 628 nm, for medium follicles it was between 618 and 620 nm, and for small follicles the absorbance wavelength was less than 618 nm.
Furthermore, it has been found that electromagnetic radiation of lower energy (visible light, where wavelengths are between 400 and 750nm) also induces different disturbances in biomolecules.
The absorbance spectra (microspectrometric specificity) for oocytes isolated from large, medium, and small follicles differ significantly (P < 0.05) and the absorbance wavelengths were between 626 and 628 nm, between 618 and 620 nm, and less than 618 nm, respectively.
The aspect ratio is varied between 1.5 and 4.0 while the normalized wavelength is varied between 1.0 and 6.0.
Working wavelength is set between the two peaks and approaching to Fano peak.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com