Unlike X, the wave function extent of XX is determined mainly by the diameter of the embedded QRs.
This means that the wave function extent of X is determined mainly by the confinement of the potential valley and the Coulomb interaction.
Furthermore, the difference was found to scale as the cube of its single-particle wave function extent and therefore can be a sensitive probe to the electron-hole wave function asymmetry.
Such anomalous behaviors for X− were explained by the apparent change in the electron wave function extent after photon emission due to the strong Coulomb attraction induced by the hole in its initial state.
The anomalous behavior is attributed to the apparent change in the electron wave function extent after photon emission due to the strong Coulomb attraction by the hole in its initial state.
As for the magnetic response of X− in QDs, we observe an anomalous diamagnetic behavior, which cannot be described by the conventional quadratic energy shift with the applied B. Such anomalous behaviors for X− can be attributed to the apparent change in the electron wave function extent after photon emission due to the strong Coulomb attraction by the hole in its initial state.
To explain this behavior, we consider here a 2D parabolic potential as the effective lateral confinement for both electrons and holes in the QDs, with a quantization energy of ℏω β and a wave function extent of, where β denotes e or h and m β are the effective masses [20, 21].
In subsequent follow-up waves, the extent of missing data among those who were interviewed was as follows: wave 2 between 0.0%% (drinking) and 1.6 % (diet); wave 3 between 0.4%% (drinking) and 2.8 % (physical activity); wave 4 between 0.3%% (physical activity) and 5.3 % (diet); and wave 5 between 0.0%% (drinking/physical activity) and 1.7 % (diet).
This phenomenon is not expected for X+ in QDs, since the wave function extents of the initial- and final-state holes are almost identical due to the fact that hole has a larger effective mass, such that the hole wave function remains well confined even in small QDs.
Therefore, the measured curvature can also be a sensitive probe to the change in wave function extents between the initial and the final-state electrons of X−. Figure 5a and 5b show the surface topography and line scans along [110] and directions of uncapped QRs.
