water for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'water for' is not a complete sentence or phrase on its own in written English.
In order to use it in written English, you must expand the phrase to make it into a complete sentence or phrase. For example, you could say "I get water for the plants every morning."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Wiki

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Water for industries versus water for drinking.

The New York Times

Start water for pasta.

The New York Times - Food

Run the water for her.

The New York Times

Water for its own sake.

Independent

The water, for instance.

The New York Times

Water for Rice Q.

The New York Times

What's the water for?

The New York Times

(Solar thermal plants require water for cooling).

The New York Times

We just have water for the table.

The New Yorker

Water, for instance.

Forbes

Clean water for everybody.

TechCrunch

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "water for", always complete the phrase with a specific purpose or noun to make it grammatically correct. For example, "water for irrigation" or "water for drinking".

Common error

Avoid using "water for" as a standalone sentence. It needs a clear object or purpose to make sense. Without context, it sounds unfinished and can confuse the reader.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "water for" typically functions as a prepositional phrase indicating purpose or intended use. Ludwig AI underlines that this phrase is grammatically incomplete without a specifying noun or gerund, requiring completion to form a coherent expression. Examples include "water for drinking" and "water for irrigation".

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Wiki

34%

News & Media

24%

Science

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "water for" is commonly used but grammatically incomplete on its own. As Ludwig AI confirms, it requires a specifying noun or gerund to indicate the purpose or intended use of the water. Its usage varies from formal scientific contexts to informal guides, with WikiHow and The New York Times being frequent sources. To ensure clarity and grammatical correctness, always complete the phrase with a clear purpose, such as "water for drinking" or "water for irrigation". Related phrases, such as "water intended for", can offer more complete and descriptive alternatives.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

water intended for

Highlights the planned or designated use of the water.

provide water to

Emphasizes the act of making water available, a more formal alternative.

supply water to

Focuses on the action of providing water, shifting from purpose to direct action.

source of water for

Highlights the origin or provision of water, slightly altering the focus.

hydrate with water

Specifically relates to the act of hydrating using water.

irrigation water for

Focuses on the act of irrigating using water.

watering solution for

Highlights a prepared water-based mixture designed for a specific purpose.

H2O designated for

Replaces "water" with its chemical formula, adding a scientific tone, while keeping the purpose.

aqua for

Uses the Latin term for water, resulting in a more sophisticated expression, while keeping the purpose.

liquid sustenance for

Replaces "water" with a more general term, emphasizing its role as a source of life.

FAQs

How can I properly use "water for" in a sentence?

Always follow "water for" with a noun or gerund that specifies the purpose or intended use. Examples include "water for plants", "water for drinking", or "water for cleaning".

What are some alternatives to "water for" that I can use in my writing?

Consider alternatives like "water intended for", "water supply for", or specify the purpose directly, such as "drinking water".

Is it grammatically correct to say just "water for"?

No, "water for" is not grammatically complete on its own. It requires additional information to specify the purpose or recipient. Ludwig AI confirms that it's not a complete sentence.

What's the difference between "water for" and "water intended for"?

"Water for" is an incomplete phrase needing completion, while "water intended for" specifies the planned use of the water, making it a more descriptive and complete expression.