Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
watch at
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "watch at" is not correct or usable in written English.
Instead, you could use the phrase "watch" or "look at." For example: "I watched the sun set on the horizon."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
News & Media
Academia
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
55 human-written examples
Watch at first possibly opportunity.
News & Media
Watch: At home with Roz Chast.
News & Media
Omar Minaya plans to watch at home.
News & Media
"I could watch at my apartment".
News & Media
Watch at 14mins, 25secs here.
News & Media
But others you can't watch at all.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
5 human-written examples
Well, first of all they watch at-risk groups carefully.
News & Media
So there's a chance to bird-watch at Wimbledon?
News & Media
What's better than a Kate Moss frow-watch at Topshop?
News & Media
Jimmer was a must-watch at BYU.
News & Media
This is group-watch at its finest. .
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When describing the act of observing something, prefer the single word "watch" or the phrase "look at" for clearer and more grammatically sound sentences.
Common error
The preposition "at" is often unnecessary after "watch". Removing it typically results in a grammatically correct sentence. For example, use "watch the game" instead of "watch at the game".
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
3.2/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "watch at" functions as a verb phrase, but it is generally considered grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI indicates the phrase is not correct, suggesting that simply using the verb "watch" or "look at" is preferable. It occasionally appears in various contexts, but more often as part of other phrases.
Frequent in
News & Media
35%
Academia
30%
Formal & Business
15%
Less common in
Wiki
10%
Science
5%
Reference
5%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, while the phrase "watch at" appears frequently, it is generally considered grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI suggests using just "watch" or "look at" instead. The phrase's prevalence across various contexts, as highlighted by the examples, doesn't validate its correctness. It's more a reflection of common errors. For clarity and grammatical accuracy, it is advisable to avoid "watch at" and opt for simpler alternatives.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
look at
Emphasizes directing one's gaze.
observe
Focuses on the act of noticing something.
view
Implies watching something more formally or deliberately.
witness
Highlights seeing something happen, especially an event.
monitor
Suggests watching something over a period of time, often for changes.
keep an eye on
Indicates watching something carefully to protect it or ensure nothing goes wrong.
pay attention to
Focuses on giving something your concentration or notice.
behold
Implies a sense of wonder or awe when watching something.
scrutinize
Highlights watching something very carefully to find flaws or details.
regard
Indicates looking at or considering something in a particular way.
FAQs
How can I correct the phrase "watch at" in a sentence?
In most cases, you can simply remove the "at". For example, instead of saying "I will watch at the parade", say "I will "watch the parade"".
Is "watch at" ever correct?
While generally incorrect, "watch at" might appear in very specific, non-standard contexts. It's best to use alternatives like "look at" or simply "watch" for clarity.
What is a simple substitute for "watch at"?
The most straightforward replacement is often just the verb "watch". For instance, instead of "We'll watch at home", use "We'll "watch home"".
Why is "watch at" considered grammatically incorrect?
The verb "watch" typically takes a direct object without needing the preposition "at". The preposition can introduce redundancy or imply an awkward phrasing. Opting for a cleaner, direct structure with just "watch" improves clarity.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
3.2/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested