was with

USAGE SUMMARY

"was with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that two or more people were together at some point in the past. For example, "We went to the grocery store together, and he was with me the whole time."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Ettinger was with her.

The New Yorker

Who was with him?

The New Yorker

"She was with him.

The New York Times

I was with Mira".

The New Yorker

He was with me.

The New York Times

Bartholomew was with her.

The New Yorker

"God was with us.

The New York Times - Sports

Who was with her?

The New York Times

"She was with her family.

Independent

I was with the crowd.

The Guardian - Music

My future was with Celtic.

The Guardian - Sport

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was with" to clearly indicate someone's presence or companionship at a specific time in the past. For instance, "She "was with" her family during the holidays."

Common error

Avoid using "was with" when "had" or "possessed" is more appropriate. For example, instead of saying "The company "was with" a strong financial backing", say "The company had strong financial backing".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was with" functions as a linking verb phrase indicating a state of being or association in the past. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability. Examples show its use in indicating presence, support, or companionship.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

95%

Formal & Business

2%

Science

1%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was with" is a grammatically sound and versatile expression used to indicate past presence, companionship, or association. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage. It is particularly prevalent in news and media contexts, serving to establish context and relationships in narratives. While alternatives like "accompanied" or "in the company of" exist, "was with" remains a straightforward and widely understood choice for conveying someone's presence at a particular time.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

together with

Directly conveys the idea of being in unison or partnership.

in the company of

Highlights the social aspect of being together.

accompanied

Focuses on the act of going somewhere together.

alongside

Indicates being next to or side by side.

present with

Stresses the act of being physically there with someone or something.

side by side with

Emphasizes the physical proximity and collaboration.

attended with

Emphasizes presence at an event or location.

in attendance with

Similar to attended with, but slightly more formal.

was present alongside

A more formal way of saying someone was there.

stood beside

Implies support or solidarity.

FAQs

How can I use "was with" in a sentence?

You can use "was with" to indicate someone's presence or companionship at a specific time in the past. For example, "He "was with" his friends at the concert."

What are some alternatives to "was with"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives like "accompanied", "in the company of", or "together with".

Is "was with" grammatically correct?

Yes, "was with" is grammatically correct and commonly used to indicate past presence or association.

What is the difference between "was with" and "accompanied"?

"Was with" generally indicates presence, while "accompanied" specifically suggests going somewhere together.