Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was well understood
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was well understood" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something was comprehended clearly or effectively in the past. Example: "The concept of gravity was well understood by the time of Newton's discoveries."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Encyclopedias
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
This was well understood on both sides.
News & Media
I wanted to verify the information we gave her was well understood," he said.
News & Media
"Warning was well understood, even if the timing and method of attacks was not," he said.
News & Media
The need for additional generation was well understood, and the utility had the money to build.
News & Media
This subtext was well understood by my collaborators on this track.
News & Media
Warning was well understood, even if the timing and method of attacks were not.
News & Media
In the past, the potential for confusion around binding debt-ceiling limits was well understood.
News & Media
Asked whether India was well understood in the West, they shook their heads.
News & Media
Our decision not to pursue that option was well understood and supported by leading equity analysts.
News & Media
By this time his purpose was well understood on both sides, and all danger was over.
News & Media
It was well understood that an edifice so demonstrably comprised of concrete and steel would also become an unforgettable metaphor.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "was well understood", ensure that the context clearly indicates who understood the concept and to what extent. Avoid ambiguity by specifying the subject and scope of understanding.
Common error
While "was well understood" is grammatically correct, overuse of passive voice can make writing sound vague. Consider using active voice for more direct and engaging prose. For example, instead of "The concept "was well understood" by the team," try "The team understood the concept well."
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was well understood" functions as a passive construction, indicating that a particular subject or concept was comprehended effectively. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used. For example, "The need for additional generation "was well understood", and the utility had the money to build."
Frequent in
News & Media
45%
Science
40%
Encyclopedias
10%
Less common in
Formal & Business
2%
Wiki
2%
Reference
1%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "was well understood" is a grammatically correct and versatile expression used to convey past comprehension or awareness. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it commonly appears in news articles, scientific papers, and encyclopedic entries. While suitable for various writing styles, remember to ensure clarity regarding who possessed the understanding and its extent. Be mindful of potential overuse of the passive voice, and consider active alternatives for a more direct tone. Rephrasing options include phrases like "people understood" or "it was clear", depending on the context. The phrase's high frequency across diverse sources underscores its importance in effective communication.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was adequately understood
Replaces "well" with "adequately", suggesting a sufficient, but perhaps not complete, understanding.
was perfectly understood
Replaces "well" with "perfectly", indicating a flawless understanding.
was clearly grasped
Uses "clearly grasped" instead of "well understood", focusing on the act of comprehension.
was fully comprehended
Uses "fully comprehended" instead of "well understood", emphasizing the completeness of the understanding.
was thoroughly grasped
Uses "thoroughly grasped" to highlight a deep and comprehensive understanding.
was completely grasped
Uses "completely grasped" to highlight a total and entire understanding.
was correctly interpreted
Focuses on the accuracy of the understanding, rather than its depth.
was rightly perceived
Emphasizes the correctness of the perception or understanding.
was commonly known
Indicates widespread knowledge rather than individual comprehension.
was generally accepted
Suggests broad agreement or belief, rather than understanding.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "was well understood" to sound more active?
You can use alternatives like "people understood", "it was clear", or "everyone knew", depending on the context.
Is it correct to say "is well understood" instead of "was well understood"?
Yes, "is well understood" is correct when referring to something that is currently understood. "Was well understood" refers to something understood in the past.
What's the difference between "was well understood" and "was misunderstood"?
"Was well understood" means something was correctly comprehended, while "was misunderstood" means something was incorrectly or not fully comprehended.
Can "was well understood" be used in both formal and informal writing?
Yes, "was well understood" is appropriate for both formal and informal writing. However, in very informal contexts, you might opt for simpler phrasing.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested