Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was well received

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was well received" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe that something was favorably accepted or appreciated. For example: The presentation was well received by the audience at the conference.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

48 human-written examples

Poplavskaya was well received.

News & Media

The New Yorker

And it was well received.

News & Media

The New York Times

His speech was well received.

News & Media

The Economist

Otherwise, however, Hollande was well received.

News & Media

The New York Times

It was well received by critics.

Bretz's paper was well received.

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

12 human-written examples

"He was well-received.

News & Media

The Guardian

Mr. Obama was well-received.

News & Media

The New York Times

The strategy was well-received.

News & Media

The Guardian

The announcement was well-received.

News & Media

The Guardian

Kim's talk was well-received.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was well received" to objectively describe how something was perceived by an audience or critics, ensuring your assessment is supported by evidence or general consensus.

Common error

Avoid using "was well received" based solely on personal opinion. Ensure there's broader agreement or factual backing to support the claim.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was well received" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject experienced a positive reception. As shown by Ludwig, the phrase is used to describe the positive reception of speeches, papers, films, and performances.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Wiki

45%

News & Media

40%

Academia

9%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Science

2%

Encyclopedias

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was well received" is a common and grammatically correct way to describe a positive reception to something. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase effectively conveys approval across diverse contexts, from news reports to academic analyses. It's crucial to ensure that its usage is grounded in objective evidence, avoiding exaggeration based solely on personal opinions. Semantically similar alternatives include "met with approval" or "garnered a positive response", offering nuanced ways to express positive reception. While broadly applicable, understanding the context ensures precise and impactful communication.

FAQs

How can I use "was well received" in a sentence?

You can use "was well received" to indicate that something was met with approval or positive feedback. For example, "The new policy was well received by the employees".

What are some alternatives to "was well received"?

Alternatives include "was favorably received", "met with approval", or "garnered a positive response" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "was well received" in formal writing?

Yes, "was well received" is appropriate for formal writing. It's a neutral and objective way to describe a positive reaction.

What does it mean when something "was well received"?

It means that something was met with approval, satisfaction, or positive feedback from an audience or critics.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: