was well ascertained

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was well ascertained" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something has been thoroughly determined or established. Example: "The results of the experiment were well ascertained before the final report was submitted."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Both studies were performed as nested case control studies within large prospective birth cohort studies; the women were recruited during pregnancy and the diagnosis of cryptorchidism was well ascertained.

Environmental Health Perspectives

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Nowadays it is well ascertained that to decrease this impact by means of structural interventions requires considerable economic resources.

International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

Another gene, Immunity-related GTPases (IRG) that play an important role in defense against intracellular pathogens and NFĸB complex which has been well ascertained to be regulated by Mta1 were also found in the network.

Plosone

These procedures are well ascertained and as long as one is recorded, these women will be indentified by the MMOI.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Although the association between FGF-23 and mortality is well ascertained in the CKD population, underlining mechanisms remain not well known yet.

CKJ: Clinical Kidney Journal

While the location where primary transmission occurred now appears to be well ascertained, the reservoir species at the origin remains unknown.

Emerging Infectious Diseases

It is well ascertained that anti-E DIII-directed Abs are virtually absent from the naïve human repertoire as they are directed away from this domain, probably against weakly neutralizing and immunodominant regions.

BioMed Research International

While it is well ascertained that baroreflex activity is modulated by both central command and exercise pressor reflex, less is known about the interaction between central command and exercise pressor reflex.

BioMed Research International

It is well ascertained that the effect on HR is limited or absent, since studies using the postexercise muscle ischemia method often report very mild or null effects on this parameter [ 13, 15, 34– 34].

BioMed Research International

It is well ascertained that central command can increase HR and blood pressure by increasing sympathetic and decreasing parasympathetic tone, respectively; however, there are no investigations demonstrating any effect of central command on cardiac contractility, preload, or afterload.

BioMed Research International

While it is well ascertained that some redundancy and neural occlusion exist between exercise pressor reflex and central command (i.e., their effects do not sum), it is also remarkable that they can all modulate the activity of the other two.

BioMed Research International

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was well ascertained" when you want to emphasize that something has been established with a high degree of certainty and through careful investigation. It is particularly suited for academic or formal writing.

Common error

Avoid using "was well ascertained" in casual conversation or informal writing. Simpler phrases like "was known" or "was clear" are often more appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was well ascertained" functions as a passive construction, indicating that a fact or piece of information has been thoroughly and definitively established. Ludwig AI confirms its usability.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was well ascertained" is a grammatically sound phrase best suited for formal, academic, or scientific contexts where emphasizing the certainty and validity of information is crucial. While Ludwig confirms its correctness, it's important to reserve it for situations where a strong emphasis on thorough investigation and definitive establishment is warranted. Simpler alternatives may be more appropriate for informal communication. The limited number of examples suggests it is not a commonly used phrase, but its presence in authoritative sources underscores its credibility when used correctly.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was clearly established

Focuses on the clarity of the establishment, implying a lack of ambiguity.

was thoroughly determined

Emphasizes the exhaustive nature of the determination process.

was definitely confirmed

Highlights the confirmation aspect, suggesting prior uncertainty.

was firmly established

Stresses the stability and strength of the establishment.

was reliably identified

Highlights the trustworthiness of the identification process.

was accurately assessed

Focuses on the precision and correctness of the assessment.

was precisely defined

Emphasizes the exactness and specificity of the definition.

was completely verified

Stresses the full and comprehensive nature of the verification.

was soundly proven

Focuses on the validity and strength of the proof.

was conclusively demonstrated

Highlights the decisive and irrefutable nature of the demonstration.

FAQs

How can I use "was well ascertained" in a sentence?

You can use "was well ascertained" to indicate that something has been thoroughly determined or established, especially after careful investigation. For example: "The facts of the case "were well ascertained" before the trial began."

What are some alternatives to "was well ascertained"?

Some alternatives include "was clearly established", "was thoroughly determined", or "was firmly established". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it better to say "was well ascertained" or "was ascertained well"?

"Was well ascertained" is the more common and grammatically correct phrasing. "Was ascertained well" is less idiomatic and sounds awkward.

What's the difference between "was well ascertained" and "was well known"?

"Was well ascertained" implies a process of investigation and verification, while "was well known" simply suggests that something is widely recognized. "Was well ascertained" carries a stronger connotation of certainty based on evidence.