Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was was

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was was" is not correct and usable in written English.
It may occur in specific contexts, such as when quoting or referencing a statement that includes the word "was" twice, but it is generally not used in standard sentences. Example: "He said that the event was was a success, but I have my doubts."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

54 human-written examples

Whoever that was was smart.

News & Media

The New York Times

What it was was fear".

News & Media

The New York Times

What it was was solid.

News & Media

The New Yorker

He was was 94.

He was was my in.

What it was was dull.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

6 human-written examples

"He was being fired".

News & Media

The New York Times

I was being naïve.

News & Media

Independent

Minimize is, are, was, and were.

"It's being interdependent".

News & Media

The New York Times

It's been clinical.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "was was" in your writing. Instead, use the single "was" or rephrase the sentence for clarity and grammatical correctness.

Common error

Be mindful of repetitive phrasing. If you find yourself using "was was", review the sentence and simplify it to avoid the duplication. Often, a single "was" or a rephrased construction will suffice.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

60%

Authority and reliability

1.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was was" lacks a defined grammatical function in standard English. Ludwig AI indicates that it is not correct and usable. It is typically considered an error unless used in direct quotation or explicit discussion of the word itself.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was was" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. Ludwig AI confirms this assessment, indicating that it is not typically usable in writing. While it may appear in direct quotations or when explicitly discussing the word "was", it should be avoided in most contexts. Instead, use the single "was" or rephrase your sentence for clarity. Related alternatives include "had been", or rephrasing the sentence to avoid repetition. Pay close attention to sentence structure to prevent unintentional repetition and ensure grammatical correctness.

FAQs

Is "was was" grammatically correct?

No, "was was" is generally grammatically incorrect and rarely used in standard English. In most cases, the repetition is unnecessary and should be avoided.

When might I encounter the phrase "was was"?

You might encounter "was was" when someone is directly quoting speech that contains the repeated word, or when explicitly discussing the word "was" itself. However, this is not typical in standard writing or speech.

What can I use instead of "was was" in a sentence?

In most cases, you can simply use "was". Depending on the context, you might also consider using phrases like "had been" or rephrasing the sentence entirely for clarity.

How can I avoid making mistakes with "was" in my writing?

Pay attention to sentence structure and verb tense agreement. Review your sentences to ensure that you are not unintentionally repeating words or using incorrect verb forms. Consider using Ludwig to check your grammar and find alternative phrasing.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

60%

Authority and reliability

1.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: