was visualized

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was visualized" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing something that has been represented or depicted in a visual format, often in the context of data, concepts, or ideas. Example: "The complex data set was visualized using an interactive graph to help the audience understand the trends more clearly."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Morphology was visualized by scanning electron microscopy.

Polymer

Plant was visualized with 2 textured planes.

IFAC Proceedings Volumes

First, the particle flocculation was visualized.

Chemical Engineering Science

No evidence of mechanical obstruction was visualized.

International Journal of Emergency Medicine

The gel was visualized using AlphaImager® EP.

Chemistry Central Journal

DNA was visualized with DAPI (blue).

Protein & Cell

EGFP was visualized directly.

Plosone

EGFP fluorescence was visualized directly.

Plosone

Immunoreactivity was visualized by electrochemiluminescence.

Plosone

Fluorescence was visualized with ApoTome.

Plosone

Fluorescence was visualized using scanning confocal microscopy.

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing scientific findings, use "was visualized" to clearly indicate that data or phenomena were observed through visual methods like microscopy or imaging techniques.

Common error

Avoid using "was visualized" when the information was obtained through non-visual means, such as statistical analysis or textual reports. Use more appropriate verbs like "was determined" or "was identified" in those cases.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was visualized" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that something underwent a process of visual representation or observation. As Ludwig AI indicates, this phrase is commonly found in scientific and technical writing.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

98%

Formal & Business

1%

News & Media

1%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was visualized" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase, especially in scientific writing. Ludwig AI analysis shows it's used to describe how data or phenomena were observed or represented through visual methods. When writing, ensure its use aligns with contexts where visual techniques are employed, and consider alternatives like "was depicted" or "was imaged" for variety. The high frequency in scientific sources suggests a formal register, emphasizing clarity and precision.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was imaged

Highlights the creation of an image, particularly in scientific or technical contexts.

was depicted

Focuses on the act of portraying something visually, often in a formal or artistic context.

was rendered

Suggests the process of creating a visual representation from data or a model.

was illustrated

Similar to 'depicted', but often implies a simpler or more explanatory visual.

was represented

Highlights the use of a visual form to stand for something else.

was observed

Emphasizes the act of noticing or perceiving something, not necessarily visually.

was displayed

Focuses on the presentation of something in a visible format.

was mapped

Indicates a visual representation that shows spatial relationships or data points.

was shown

A more general term for presenting something, visually or otherwise.

could be seen

Emphasizes the possibility of visual observation.

FAQs

How can I use "was visualized" in a sentence?

Use "was visualized" when describing how something was observed or represented visually, such as "The cell structure was visualized using electron microscopy."

What are some alternatives to "was visualized"?

You can use alternatives like "was depicted", "was observed", or "was imaged" depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "the data was visualized"?

Yes, it is correct to say "the data was visualized" if you are describing how data was presented in a visual format, such as a graph or chart.

Which is the correct way to say it, “the results were visualized” or “the results were observed”?

Both can be correct, but they have slightly different meanings. "The results "were visualized"" suggests a visual representation was created, while "the results "were observed"" implies that the results were simply noticed or detected.