was vetoed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was vetoed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that a decision or proposal was rejected or blocked by someone in authority, typically in a legislative or formal context. Example: "The proposed bill was vetoed by the governor, preventing it from becoming law."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

A fur line was vetoed.

The New York Times

The act was vetoed by Pres.

Encyclopedia Britannica

That was vetoed by Russia and China".

The Guardian

The most obvious choice, Nigeria, was vetoed by its neighbours.

The Economist

But he was vetoed by the Republican voters.

The New York Times

But like many of their plans, that was vetoed.

The New York Times

The measure was vetoed by Governor Pataki earlier this month.

The New York Times

For that reason, it was vetoed by President Bill Clinton.

The New York Times

In Arizona it was vetoed by the governor.

The Guardian

It was vetoed by the society's committee and never performed.

The Guardian

My proposal to subsititute live frogs was vetoed.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was vetoed" to clearly indicate that a decision or proposal was formally rejected by someone with the authority to do so. It is most appropriate in contexts where official actions are being described, such as in politics, law, or organizational governance.

Common error

Avoid using "was vetoed" in casual conversations or informal writing. It is a formal term, and using it in informal settings can sound overly dramatic or out of place. Opt for more casual alternatives like "was rejected" or "was turned down" in such situations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was vetoed" functions as a passive voice construction of the verb "veto", indicating that a subject (e.g., a bill, a proposal) has been rejected by an authority. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

83%

Wiki

8%

Encyclopedias

3%

Less common in

Science

2%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was vetoed" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression, primarily found in news and media contexts, to indicate that a proposal or decision has been formally rejected by an authority. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and offers practical advice on its proper usage. While interchangeable with synonyms like "was rejected" in some contexts, "was vetoed" carries a more formal tone and specifies the presence of an authority figure blocking an action. Therefore, it's best suited for formal or neutral communications, and less appropriate for informal settings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was rejected

Direct synonym indicating a refusal or non-acceptance.

was blocked

Implies an obstruction or prevention of progress.

was overruled

Suggests a higher authority reversed a decision.

was turned down

Informal way to say a proposal was refused.

was dismissed

Indicates a lack of consideration or importance given.

was invalidated

Implies the action or decision was made void or without legal standing.

was quashed

Suggests that an action was suppressed or put down completely.

was nullified

Indicates the action was rendered legally void.

was prohibited

Suggests a formal ban or restriction.

was disapproved

Implies a lack of official agreement or support.

FAQs

What does "was vetoed" mean?

"Was vetoed" means that a proposal, law, or decision was formally rejected or blocked by someone with the authority to do so. It typically implies a power to prevent something from proceeding.

What can I say instead of "was vetoed"?

You can use alternatives like "was rejected", "was blocked", or "was overruled" depending on the context.

Is it appropriate to use "was vetoed" in informal conversations?

While grammatically correct, "was vetoed" is a formal term. In informal settings, it is generally better to use more casual alternatives such as "was turned down" or "was rejected".

How does the meaning of "was vetoed" differ from "was rejected"?

While both indicate a lack of acceptance, "was vetoed" specifically implies a formal rejection by someone with the power to prevent the action, while "was rejected" is a more general term that can apply in various situations without necessarily involving a formal authority.