Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
The questionnaire was validated for construct, content, face validity, and reliability.
The model was validated for two applications.
The methodology was validated for skull-base tumors in Hall et al (2017).
The simulation model was validated for a cooling design day.
This was validated for elastoplastic, viscoelastic and rubbery behaviours.
The procedure was validated for specificity, linearity, accuracy and precision.
The procedure was validated for five minutes in both steps.
The method was validated for quantitative determination of the drug.
Subsequently, the yield model was validated for four temperature regimes.
One bELISA was validated for the serological diagnosis of CPIV3.
The cell line was validated for PyMT expression; pan-keratin positivity; and Vimentin, smooth muscle actin, and CD45 negativity.
More suggestions(19)
was attested for
was confirmed for
was certified for
was verified for
was replicated for
was ascertained for
was illustrated for
was liquidated for
was legitimized for
was demonstrated for
was reaffirmed for
was identified for
was substantiated for
was investigated for
currently validated for
was reiterated for
considered validated for
become validated for
well validated for
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com