was used with

USAGE SUMMARY

"was used with" is correct and usable in written English.
It is usually used to indicate that one material or object was used with or combined with another. Example: The adhesive was used with the screws to secure the frame to the wall.

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

It was used yesterday for the ceremonial first trip back.

The New York Times

A postpartum defense was used this year.

Los Angeles Times

Structure used was using 5,173 parameters and 49,666 reflections.

Chemistry Central Journal

Here are some useful ways Big Data is being used today.

Huffington Post

It could be used today.

The New York Times

Both treatments are used today.

Transplantation Proceedings

"All the ships are being used today.

The New York Times

It's still being used today.

Harvard Business Review

How is CEDAR being used today?

Stanford University

Hodgkin-Huxley inactivation gates were used (n^8*h1^+n^8*h2).

Yale University

Check if no demonstrations were used this week.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was used with" to clearly indicate that two or more items or methods were employed together for a specific purpose. This ensures clarity and avoids ambiguity in your writing.

Common error

Avoid substituting "with" for other prepositions that might alter the intended meaning. For example, "was used for" indicates purpose, while "was used by" indicates the user, not a complementary element.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was used with" functions as a passive construction, indicating that a subject received an action in conjunction with another element. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was used with" is a grammatically sound phrase for indicating the co-employment of two or more elements. While Ludwig AI confirms its correctness, the lack of direct examples suggests careful attention to context is needed for optimal usage. Alternatives like "was combined with" or "was utilized in conjunction with" can add nuance or formality, depending on the writing objective. Pay attention to preposition choice to maintain accuracy and avoid unintended meanings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was combined with

Focuses on the act of merging or blending elements.

was paired with

Suggests a deliberate matching or association.

was employed alongside

Emphasizes the parallel use of two elements.

was utilized in conjunction with

Highlights a more formal and planned combination.

was integrated with

Implies a deeper level of connection and interdependence.

was implemented together with

Stresses the simultaneous application of multiple components.

was incorporated alongside

Highlights adding something as part of a larger whole.

was administered with

Suggests simultaneous giving of different things.

was furnished with

Focuses on equipping or supplying something with additional elements.

was supported by

Emphasizes the auxiliary role one thing does for another.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "was used with" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "was utilized in conjunction with" or "was employed alongside".

What's a simpler way to say "was used with"?

A simpler alternative is "was combined with", which is often more direct and easier to understand.

Is there a difference between "was used with" and "was used for"?

"Was used with" indicates that two things were employed together, whereas "was used for" indicates the purpose of something. For example, "the tool was used with the adhesive" vs. "the tool was used for applying the adhesive."

When is it appropriate to use "was implemented together with" instead of "was used with"?

"Was implemented together with" is suitable when referring to systems, programs, or processes that are applied simultaneously. In contrast, "was used with" is applicable more broadly to objects or methods used in conjunction.