was updated with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was updated with" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
Example: The company's website was updated with the latest product information and customer reviews.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This article was updated with Weigel's reporting.

The Washington Post

This article was updated with additional material at 5.10pm BST.

The Guardian - Opinion

This post was updated with additional comment .

TechCrunch

This report was updated with additional comment.

TechCrunch

This post was updated with additional comment.

TechCrunch

This report was updated with additional comment .

TechCrunch

This article was updated with additional comment.

TechCrunch

This article was updated with a correction.

Los Angeles Times

This post was updated with additonal information.

Los Angeles Times

This story was updated with students' ages.

Los Angeles Times

This article was updated with Rubio's response.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was updated with", ensure the added information is relevant and clearly enhances the original content. Use this phrase to signal that the content has been improved or corrected.

Common error

Avoid using "was updated with" without specifying what was updated. Always provide context about the new information or changes made to maintain clarity for the reader.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was updated with" functions as a passive construction, indicating that a subject has undergone a modification through the addition of new data, comments, or information. This function aligns with Ludwig AI's assessment of the phrase's grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was updated with" is a grammatically correct and very common expression used primarily in news and media contexts to indicate that content has been revised to include new information. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is widely accepted and serves to inform readers about recent modifications. Best practice involves specifying what exactly was updated to maintain clarity. The phrase's neutral register makes it suitable for broad audiences, and it is often used to signal improvements or corrections to existing content.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

included new information

Focuses on the inclusion of new details, omitting the updating aspect.

incorporated additional details

Highlights the integration of extra details, differing from a general update.

featured the latest information

Emphasizes the presence of the most current information, not necessarily an update.

had revisions integrated

This is in passive form, focusing on revisions being added.

saw the addition of

Highlights the addition, differing from the updating aspect of adding revisions to something that already exists.

was supplemented by

Suggests an addition to enhance completeness, but isn't synonymous to updating.

gained new insights

Focuses on newly acquired knowledge without necessarily updating.

obtained new data

Highlights new data, omitting information about something being updated.

received a refresh with

Focuses more on the refreshing than on the updated aspect.

was enriched with

Implies an enhancement through the addition.

FAQs

How can I use "was updated with" in a sentence?

Use "was updated with" to indicate that something has been revised to include new or more accurate information. For example, "The report was updated with the latest figures" or "The article was updated with new comments from the source".

What are some alternatives to "was updated with"?

You can use alternatives like "included new information", "incorporated additional details", or "featured the latest information" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "is updated with" instead of "was updated with"?

"Is updated with" implies a continuous or regular update process, whereas "was updated with" indicates a single, past instance of updating. Choose the appropriate tense based on whether the update is ongoing or completed.

What's the difference between "was updated with" and "was revised with"?

"Was updated with" generally means new information was added, whereas "was revised with" suggests that changes, corrections, or improvements were made to existing content. The two phrases can be used almost interchangeably depending on the intention.