Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was thought

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was thought" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate a belief or opinion that was held in the past. Example: "It was thought that the project would be completed by the end of the year."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

It was thought….

News & Media

The New Yorker

Yes it was, thought Branca.

Or so it was thought.

He was thought to be dead.

News & Media

The Economist

Hillary Clinton was thought to have won.

News & Media

The Economist

Delirium once was thought to be transient.

News & Media

The New York Times

He was thought to be traveling alone.

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

4 human-written examples

Danner's article was thought-provoking.

News & Media

The New York Times

"They're thought out".

Everything is thought out.

"It's thought out.

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was thought" to convey past beliefs or understandings that may or may not be true today. This phrasing is particularly useful when discussing historical perspectives or outdated theories.

Common error

Avoid relying too heavily on passive constructions like "was thought", which can make your writing sound less direct and engaging. Whenever possible, rephrase to use active voice for greater clarity and impact.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was thought" functions as a passive construction, indicating a belief, opinion, or understanding that existed in the past. Ludwig examples illustrate its use in various contexts, such as describing superseded scientific theories or historical perspectives.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

43%

Science

32%

Academia

18%

Less common in

Wiki

4%

Formal & Business

2%

Encyclopedias

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was thought" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive construction that serves to denote past beliefs or understandings. According to Ludwig, its prevalence across diverse sources, including news, scientific publications, and academic texts, underscores its versatility and broad applicability. When employing this phrase, it's advisable to consider the potential for overuse of passive voice and, where appropriate, opt for more direct and engaging alternatives to enhance clarity and impact.

FAQs

How can I use "was thought" in a sentence?

Use "was thought" to describe a past belief or understanding. For example, "It was thought that the world was flat."

What are some alternatives to "was thought"?

You can use alternatives like "it was believed", "it was considered", or "it was assumed" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Which is correct, "was thought" or "is thought"?

"Was thought" indicates a past belief, while "is thought" indicates a current belief. The correct choice depends on the time frame you're referring to.

What is the difference between "was thought" and "was known"?

"Was thought" suggests a belief or opinion, while "was known" implies a confirmed fact or established knowledge. "Was known" carries a stronger sense of certainty.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: