was third with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was third with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate a ranking or position in a competition or comparison, often followed by a specific context or subject. Example: "In the final standings, she was third with a total of 85 points."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Sports

General

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

CBS was third with reruns.

The New York Times - Arts

CBS was third with repeats.

The New York Times

Fox was third with 1.316 million.

The New York Times

Yahoo Mail was third with 58.33 percent.

The New York Times

ABC was third with "Shaq Vs".

The New York Times - Arts

Ashley Wagner, 18, was third, with 184.70.

The New York Times - Sports

ABC was third with 9.3.

The New York Times - Arts

Yale was third with 65.

The New York Times

Russia was third with 244.400.

The New York Times - Sports

"Robin Hood" was third with $18.7 million $66.1 millionn total).

The New York Times

Columbia University was third, with 5,116.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was third with", ensure the context clearly indicates what is being ranked or measured. For instance, specify the category (e.g., points, revenue, votes) for clarity.

Common error

Ensure that the subject performing the action is clearly stated. Avoid sentences where it's unclear who or what "was third with" the specified amount or achievement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was third with" functions primarily as a stative verb phrase indicating a rank or position achieved along with a specific value. Ludwig's examples showcase its use in various contexts, such as sports, finance, and general rankings, describing a quantified achievement.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Sports

35%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Science

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was third with" is a common and grammatically sound way to express a ranking or placement alongside a specific metric. Ludwig provides numerous examples from reputable sources, demonstrating its versatility across news, sports, and business contexts. Understanding its function and purpose allows for clear and precise communication. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase is used correctly in written English.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Finished third with

Replaces "was" with "finished", emphasizing the completion of the ranking.

Came in third with

Uses "came in" instead of "was", implying arrival at a particular position.

Ranked third with

Emphasizes the ranking aspect using the verb "ranked".

Placed third with

Uses "placed" to indicate the position achieved.

Secured third position with

More formal, emphasizes the act of securing the position.

Achieved third place with

Highlights the accomplishment of reaching third place.

Took third with

Replaces "was" with "took", providing a slightly different nuance.

Held third position with

Implies maintaining the third position during a process.

Ended up third with

Suggests that third position was the final outcome.

Resulted in third with

Focuses on the outcome leading to third place.

FAQs

How can I use "was third with" in a sentence?

Use "was third with" to indicate that someone or something achieved the third position in a ranking, followed by the specific amount, score, or quantity they had. For example, "The team was third with 50 points".

What's a good alternative to "was third with"?

Alternatives include "finished third with", "ranked third with", or "placed third with". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "was third" or should I always include "with"?

While "was third" is grammatically correct, adding "with" followed by a specific metric (e.g., points, votes, dollars) provides context and makes the statement clearer and more informative. For example: "He was third", vs "He was third with 200 points".

What is the difference between "was third with" and "came in third with"?

"Was third with" is a more general statement of position, while "came in third with" implies a process or competition leading to that position. They are often interchangeable, but "came in third" emphasizes the act of arriving at that rank.