The design effect was therefore calculated to be D = 2.8 which, multiplied by the original calculated sample size, gave a required sample size of 261 farms.
The EE was therefore calculated with the following equation: EE = F e /F t.
The reflectance factor [2] was therefore calculated using the standard two-point correction [4, 5].
The computation reduction was therefore calculated as Delta Z = frac{{Z_{s} }}{{Z_{o} }} times 100%.
The reflectance factor of the white diffuser was therefore calculated following the same procedure as in the butterfly wings.
The composite strength was therefore calculated by linear regression for composites with 50 vol% fibres based on interpolation.
The contribution of the activity from the first injection to the second was therefore calculated and subtracted.
A threshold was therefore calculated to obtain a hard decision; the best value turned out to be 0.4, which provided a correct classification of 79% of pedestrians and 85% of other objects.
The speech cancellation (SCINT) was therefore calculated as the ratio of the speech signal output power to speech signal input power, frequency weighted and averaged in dB, similar to the intelligibility-weighted SNR calculation described above (10).
The sample size was therefore calculated considering HIV positive and HIV negative patients.
The false discovery rate q value was therefore calculated, which denotes the expected proportion of false negatives among multiple findings.
