was suppressed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was suppressed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation where something was forcibly put down, restrained, or prevented from being expressed or released. Example: "The dissenting voices in the meeting were suppressed by the dominant opinions of the group."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The book was suppressed.

The New Yorker

The list was suppressed in June 1966.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The revolt was suppressed in 345 bce.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The society was suppressed in 1896.

Encyclopedia Britannica

It was suppressed by the government.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The Portuguese Inquisition was suppressed in 1821.

Encyclopedia Britannica

He said no data was suppressed.

The New York Times

His identity was suppressed by the commission.

The Guardian

But with annexation, Hawaiian was suppressed.

The New York Times - Arts

Hence, Naph sorption was suppressed.

Carbon

The Revolutionary Tribunal was suppressed on May 31 , 1795

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was suppressed" to describe situations where information, actions, or expressions are deliberately held back or stopped, especially by an authority or force.

Common error

Avoid replacing appropriate active voice verbs with a passive construction using "was suppressed". Active voice often provides clearer and more direct communication. For example, instead of "The government was suppressed the report", use "The government suppressed the report".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was suppressed" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that the subject of the sentence underwent an action of being forcibly stopped or controlled. This grammatical structure emphasizes the recipient of the action rather than the actor. According to Ludwig AI, it is correct and frequently found in reliable sources.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

36%

News & Media

33%

Encyclopedias

19%

Less common in

Academia

9%

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was suppressed" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive verb phrase, particularly within scientific, news, and encyclopedic contexts. It describes situations where actions or expressions are deliberately held back or stopped, often by an authority or force. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is accurate and widely applicable. While suitable for various formality levels, it's best practice to use active voice when possible for clearer communication. Alternatives include "was prevented", "was quelled", and "was stifled".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was prevented

Indicates that something was stopped from happening or being expressed.

was quelled

Suggests that something was subdued or brought under control, often referring to unrest or rebellion.

was stifled

Implies that something was smothered or restrained, often referring to emotions or ideas.

was restrained

Indicates that something was held back or kept in check.

was subdued

Suggests that something was brought under control or made less intense.

was repressed

Implies that something was forcibly kept out of consciousness or expression.

was inhibited

Indicates that something was hindered or slowed down.

was curtailed

Suggests that something was reduced or limited.

was censored

Implies that something was officially examined and altered or suppressed.

was hushed up

Indicates that something was kept secret or quiet, often to avoid embarrassment or scandal.

FAQs

How can I use "was suppressed" in a sentence?

The phrase "was suppressed" is used to indicate that something has been forcibly put down, restrained, or prevented from being expressed. For example: "The evidence was suppressed due to legal concerns."

What are some alternatives to "was suppressed"?

You can use alternatives such as "was prevented", "was quelled", or "was stifled" depending on the specific context.

When is it appropriate to use "was suppressed" instead of "was prevented"?

"Was suppressed" often implies a deliberate act of force or authority to stop something, whereas "was prevented" can refer to any action that hindered something from happening, regardless of intent. For example, "The rebellion was suppressed" suggests forceful action, while "The accident was prevented" implies averting an incident.

Is "was suppressed" formal or informal?

The phrase "was suppressed" is suitable for both formal and informal contexts. Its appropriateness depends more on the surrounding language and the overall tone of the communication.