was supported with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was supported with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something was aided or backed by additional information, resources, or evidence. Example: "The research findings were supported with data from multiple studies, enhancing their credibility."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This section was supported with a composite honeycomb core.

Measurement

This research was supported with funding from the Harvard Inequality & Social Policy multidisciplinary program.

Harvard University

This research was supported with funding from Voqal and Harvard's Institute for Quantitative Social Science.

Harvard University

This research was supported with funding from the Harvard University Herbaria.

Harvard University

This research was supported with funding from the National Institute on Aging.

Harvard University

This research was supported with funding from the National Science Foundation.

Harvard University

This research was supported with funding from Harvard University and Google.

Harvard University

The petition was supported with affidavits from Mrs. De la Renta, Mr. Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger.

The New York Times

Finding the optimum settings in SED was supported with Statsoft Statistica 13.

Procedia Computer Science

Self-monitoring was supported with similar decreases in scores on standardized measures of OCD.

Behavior Therapy

Test retest reliability was supported with coefficients ranging from 0.77 to 0.89.

Pain Management Nursing

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was supported with", ensure that the 'with' preposition is followed by a noun or noun phrase that clearly identifies what provided the support, creating a clear and concise sentence.

Common error

Avoid using "was supported with" without a clear indication of what is providing the support. Vague or missing support information weakens the statement. Always specify the source.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was supported with" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject received aid, backing, or reinforcement from a specified resource or entity. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

66%

Academia

24%

News & Media

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Wiki

1%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was supported with" is a grammatically sound phrase frequently used to denote that a subject received assistance or reinforcement from a specific source. Ludwig's analysis of numerous examples shows its prevalence in scientific, academic, and news contexts, where precision in identifying sources of support is crucial. While alternatives like "was aided by" or "was reinforced by" exist, the choice depends on the specific nuance intended. It's key to clearly identify the source of support following the "with" preposition to avoid ambiguity. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is correct and readily usable.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was aided by

This alternative uses "aided" instead of "supported", suggesting assistance but not necessarily foundational backing.

was assisted by

This alternative is similar to "was aided by", implying help but potentially less comprehensive support.

was reinforced by

This emphasizes strengthening through additional evidence or resources.

was underpinned by

This suggests a foundational level of support or justification.

was bolstered by

Similar to "reinforced", this implies strengthening or encouragement.

was backed by

Suggests endorsement or approval, implying a form of support.

benefited from

This highlights the positive outcome of receiving support.

relied upon

Implies dependence on something for support.

was supplemented by

Indicates that something was added to enhance support.

was substantiated by

Focuses on providing evidence to confirm or support something.

FAQs

How do I use "was supported with" in a sentence?

Use "was supported with" to indicate that something received help, funding, or evidence from a specific source. For instance, "The project "was supported with funding" from the National Institute of Health".

What are some alternatives to "was supported with"?

Alternatives include "was aided by", "was assisted by", or "was reinforced by", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use "was supported with" or "was supported by"?

Both "was supported with" and "was supported by" are grammatically correct, but "was supported with" is generally used when referring to tangible resources or evidence, while "was supported by" refers to people or organizations.

Can I say "is supported with" instead of "was supported with"?

Yes, use "is supported with" to describe something currently receiving support, and "was supported with" for something that received support in the past.