was supported in

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was supported in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that someone or something received assistance or backing in a particular context or situation. Example: "The project was supported in its early stages by several key investors who believed in its potential."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

_Towell's project was supported, in part, by the Magnum Foundation.

The New Yorker

He was supported in that view by Mr. Grundfest.

The New York Times

Towell's project was supported, in part, by the Magnum Foundation.

The New Yorker

Mondondo was supported in his claims by the minority organization Conseil représentatif des associations noires (Cran).

The Guardian

The study was supported in part by Merck and Pfizer, the drugs' makers.

The New York Times - Health

From the start, Common Quest was supported in large part by the American Jewish Committee.

The New York Times

The decision was supported in full by six justices; three justices dissented in part.

The New York Times

The research was supported in part by the National Geographic Society.

The New York Times

He was supported in this analysis by Justice Souter and Justice John Paul Stevens.

The New York Times

Howard was supported in her case by the Metropolitan Police Federation.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

Julia was supported in-house in our private SPARKteam Facebook community.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was supported in" when you want to clearly indicate that something or someone received assistance, funding, or approval in a specific context.

Common error

Avoid overuse of the passive voice with "was supported in" if it obscures who provided the support. Instead, rephrase to use an active voice, making the source of support clear and direct, like "The National Science Foundation supported this research".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was supported in" typically functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject received assistance, funding, or approval within a specific context. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and usable nature in English writing.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

63%

News & Media

35%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was supported in" is a grammatically correct and versatile expression used to indicate that someone or something received assistance, funding, or validation within a specific context. It is commonly found in scientific and news media sources, as validated by Ludwig. Its use often aims to convey factual information objectively, especially in formal writing. While grammatically sound, clarity can be improved by ensuring the source of support is clearly identified, especially to avoid overuse of the passive voice. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is correct and usable in written English.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

received backing in

Replaces "supported" with "backing", emphasizing the act of receiving support.

was aided by

Uses "aided" instead of "supported", suggesting a helping hand.

found assistance in

Highlights the act of finding help or support.

benefited from help with

Emphasizes the positive outcome of receiving support.

garnered support for

Focuses on the act of gathering support or approval.

had endorsement for

Implies a formal approval or backing.

was promoted by

Suggests active encouragement and advancement.

gained momentum through

Indicates increased progress due to support.

was fostered by

Implies nurturing and development through support.

secured approval for

Emphasizes the act of obtaining formal agreement or backing.

FAQs

How can I use "was supported in" in a sentence?

You can use "was supported in" to indicate that something received assistance or backing in a particular context. For example, "The project "was supported in part" by the Magnum Foundation."

What can I say instead of "was supported in"?

Alternatives include "received backing in", "was aided by", or "found assistance in" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it grammatically correct to say "was supported in"?

Yes, it is grammatically correct and commonly used in written English to indicate that someone or something received assistance or backing in a specific context or situation.

What's the difference between "was supported in" and "was supported by"?

"Was supported in" typically refers to support within a specific area or aspect, while "was supported by" usually indicates the entity providing the support. For example, "The hypothesis "was supported in the data"" versus "The project was supported by the National Endowment for the Arts."