was supplanted

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was supplanted" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that one thing has been replaced or overtaken by another in a specific context. Example: "The old technology was supplanted by newer, more efficient systems."

✓ Grammatically correct

Encyclopedias

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

It was supplanted by vaccination after 1798.

Britannica

It was supplanted by the Ming in 1368.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Led the campaign until he was supplanted by Manafort.

The Washington Post

The Celtic population was supplanted by Germanic tribes.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Realism was supplanted by fantasy; storytelling was abandoned for sensation.

The New York Times - Magazine

In the 20th century, Britain was supplanted by New York City.

Yale University

In the 1990s, this campaign was supplanted by the independent Campaign for Military Service.

The Washington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

4 human-written examples

The DJ mixtape was supplanting the compilation CD.

The Guardian - Music

A Bangladeshi influx in northwestern Queens was supplanting Chinese residents and contributing to the variegated mosaic.

The New York Times

Tuchman has been supplanted.

The New York Times - Books

"He has been supplanted by the rappers".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid overuse of "was supplanted" in informal contexts, as it can sound overly formal or pretentious. Consider using a simpler synonym like "was replaced" for casual writing.

Common error

Don't use "was supplanted" when a simpler word like "replaced" would suffice. Overusing formal language can make your writing sound unnatural and less accessible to a wider audience.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was supplanted" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that the subject underwent a change by being replaced or superseded by something else. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a grammatically sound way to describe a replacement.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Encyclopedias

30%

News & Media

50%

Science

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was supplanted" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive verb construction. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is appropriate for use in English writing. It signifies that something has been replaced or superseded by something else, often with a nuance of formality or authority. While versatile, it appears most commonly in encyclopedias, news articles, and scientific publications. For more casual communication scenarios, consider using simpler alternatives like "was replaced".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was replaced by

Direct substitution of "supplanted" with the simpler and more common synonym "replaced".

was superseded by

Uses "superseded" which implies a more formal and complete replacement.

was taken over by

Focuses on the action of one entity assuming control from another.

was overthrown by

Emphasizes a forceful or sudden removal from a position of power.

was succeeded by

Indicates that something came after and took the place of something else.

was unseated by

Suggests a removal from a position, often in a competitive context.

was displaced by

Implies a shifting or moving of one thing to make way for another.

yielded to

Indicates that something gave way or conceded to something else, resulting in being replaced.

was ousted by

Suggests a removal, often from a position of power, usually against one's will.

gave way to

Implies a gradual replacement or yielding to something else, often due to pressure or change.

FAQs

What does "was supplanted" mean?

The phrase "was supplanted" means something was replaced or superseded by something else. It implies that the replacement was complete, and the original thing no longer holds its former position or function.

What are some alternatives to "was supplanted"?

You can use alternatives like "was replaced by", "was superseded by", or "was taken over by", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

How is "was supplanted" different from "was replaced"?

While both phrases indicate that something has taken the place of something else, "was supplanted" often suggests a more complete or authoritative replacement. "Was replaced" is a more general term and can apply to a wider range of situations.

Is it appropriate to use "was supplanted" in informal writing?

While grammatically correct, "was supplanted" might sound overly formal in casual or informal writing. In such contexts, a simpler phrase like "was replaced" or "gave way to" might be more appropriate.