was subsequently

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was subsequently" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that something happened after a previous event or action. Example: "The proposal was submitted on Monday and was subsequently approved by the board on Wednesday."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It was subsequently detonated.

The New York Times

He was subsequently arrested.

The Guardian

Monroe was subsequently arrested.

The Guardian - Film

It was subsequently closed.

The Guardian

Goodman was subsequently jailed.

The Guardian

He was subsequently fired.

The New York Times

He was subsequently cleared.

The Guardian

It was subsequently granted.

The New York Times

Kelly was subsequently hanged.

The Guardian

He was subsequently deported.

The Washington Post

It was subsequently rebuilt.

Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was subsequently", ensure that the sequence of events is clear and logical. The phrase works best when the second event is a direct consequence of the first.

Common error

Avoid using "was subsequently" when the events are not directly related or when there is a significant time gap between them. It suggests a closer connection than may exist, potentially misleading the reader.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was subsequently" functions as an adverbial phrase that modifies a verb, indicating the timing of an action or event in relation to a previous one. As Ludwig AI suggests, it denotes that something occurred following a prior event.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

63%

Encyclopedias

15%

Wiki

12%

Less common in

Science

8%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was subsequently" is a common adverbial phrase used to indicate that an event occurred after another, often implying a cause-and-effect relationship. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread use. It's most frequently found in news and media, encyclopedias, and scientific contexts, suggesting a neutral to formal register. While alternatives like "was later" or "then" exist, "was subsequently" provides a more explicit connection between events. When employing this phrase, ensure that the sequence is logical and clear to avoid misleading readers. Overall, it is an expression that can be used safely and effectively.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was later

This alternative is shorter and more direct, replacing "subsequently" with "later".

was afterward

Similar to "was later", this replaces "subsequently" with "afterward", indicating a sequence in time.

then

A concise alternative that implies a direct sequence of events.

thereafter

A more formal synonym for "subsequently", indicating a time sequence.

following that

This phrase explicitly states that something happened after a previous event.

in the aftermath

This phrase implies that an event occurred as a result of a preceding event.

in due course

Indicates that something happened at an appropriate time after a preceding event.

in consequence

This alternative emphasizes a cause-and-effect relationship.

as a result

Similar to "in consequence", this highlights the result of a preceding action.

accordingly

This implies that something was done in response to a previous action or decision.

FAQs

How can I use "was subsequently" in a sentence?

Use "was subsequently" to indicate that an event happened after and usually as a result of a previous event. For example, "The bill was introduced and "was subsequently passed" by the senate."

What are some alternatives to "was subsequently"?

Alternatives include "was later", "was afterward", "then", and "thereafter". The best choice depends on the specific context and desired level of formality.

Is "was subsequently" formal or informal?

"Was subsequently" is generally considered more formal than alternatives like "was later" or "then". It's suitable for academic, professional, and journalistic writing.

What is the difference between "was subsequently" and "was then"?

"Was subsequently" implies a causal or consequential relationship between two events, while "was then" simply indicates a sequence in time without necessarily implying causation. For example, "The meeting was adjourned and was then followed by a networking event" suggests two successive but unrelated actions.