Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was started on
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase 'was started on' is both correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to the beginning of an event or process. For example: "The construction project was started on August 1st."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(6)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
He was started on intravenous fluids.
News & Media
She was started on a blood thinner.
News & Media
The patient was started on anti-gout therapy.
News & Media
The patient was started on the essential hormone.
News & Media
The patient was started on RHZE.
No treatment was started on this occasion.
Ribavirin therapy was started on POD 327.
Science
He was started on oral steroids.
He was started on intravenous vancomycin and ceftazidime.
According to histopathology, the patient was started on empiric cloxacillin.
The patient was started on a range of motion exercises.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "was started on", ensure clarity by specifying what exactly was initiated. For instance, instead of just saying "the project was started on Monday", clarify with "the construction project was started on Monday."
Common error
Avoid using "was started on" without a clear subject. Saying "it was started on Tuesday" leaves the reader wondering what "it" refers to. Always specify the subject for clarity.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was started on" functions as a passive construction, indicating that an action (starting something) was performed upon a subject. Ludwig's examples show its frequent use in medical contexts, where a patient is 'started on' a treatment.
Frequent in
Science
70%
News & Media
20%
Wiki
10%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "was started on" is a grammatically sound and commonly used phrase that indicates the initiation of an action or process. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's suitable for describing the commencement of treatments, projects, or activities. Predominantly found in scientific and news contexts, this phrase maintains a neutral to formal tone. To use it effectively, ensure clarity by specifying the subject and avoiding vagueness. Related phrases like "was launched on" or "was commenced on" can provide alternative ways to express the same idea with subtle differences in emphasis.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was launched on
Focuses on the initiation of a project or product, often implying a public introduction or unveiling.
was commenced on
Emphasizes the formal beginning of an activity or process, often used in official or legal contexts.
was initiated on
Highlights the start of a process or action, often suggesting a deliberate and planned beginning.
began on
A more general and simple way to indicate the start of something, lacking the formality of "commenced" or "initiated".
kicked off on
An informal way to say something began, often used to describe the start of an event or project.
was set in motion on
Suggests the activation of a series of events or actions, emphasizing the dynamic aspect of the beginning.
was implemented on
Highlights the start of a plan or system being put into effect, emphasizing the practical execution.
was activated on
Focuses on bringing something into operation or making it functional from a specific date.
was triggered on
Implies a specific event or action caused something else to begin, focusing on the cause-and-effect relationship.
was inaugurated on
Used for formal beginnings, particularly of public projects or official roles, adding a sense of ceremony.
FAQs
How can I use "was started on" in a sentence?
Use "was started on" to indicate when a process or activity began. For example, "The patient "was started on antibiotics"" or "The project "was started on Monday"".
What are some alternatives to "was started on"?
Alternatives include "was launched on", "was commenced on", or "was initiated on", depending on the context.
Is it better to say "was started on" or "began on"?
"Began on" is simpler and more general. "Was started on" is suitable when you want to emphasize that something was actively initiated or put into motion on a specific date.
What is the difference between "was started on" and "was implemented on"?
"Was started on" is a general term for the beginning of something. "Was implemented on" specifically refers to putting a plan or system into effect, emphasizing practical execution.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested