Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was started on

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'was started on' is both correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to the beginning of an event or process. For example: "The construction project was started on August 1st."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He was started on intravenous fluids.

News & Media

The New York Times

She was started on a blood thinner.

News & Media

The New Yorker

The patient was started on anti-gout therapy.

The patient was started on the essential hormone.

The patient was started on RHZE.

No treatment was started on this occasion.

Ribavirin therapy was started on POD 327.

He was started on oral steroids.

He was started on intravenous vancomycin and ceftazidime.

According to histopathology, the patient was started on empiric cloxacillin.

The patient was started on a range of motion exercises.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was started on", ensure clarity by specifying what exactly was initiated. For instance, instead of just saying "the project was started on Monday", clarify with "the construction project was started on Monday."

Common error

Avoid using "was started on" without a clear subject. Saying "it was started on Tuesday" leaves the reader wondering what "it" refers to. Always specify the subject for clarity.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was started on" functions as a passive construction, indicating that an action (starting something) was performed upon a subject. Ludwig's examples show its frequent use in medical contexts, where a patient is 'started on' a treatment.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

70%

News & Media

20%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was started on" is a grammatically sound and commonly used phrase that indicates the initiation of an action or process. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's suitable for describing the commencement of treatments, projects, or activities. Predominantly found in scientific and news contexts, this phrase maintains a neutral to formal tone. To use it effectively, ensure clarity by specifying the subject and avoiding vagueness. Related phrases like "was launched on" or "was commenced on" can provide alternative ways to express the same idea with subtle differences in emphasis.

FAQs

How can I use "was started on" in a sentence?

Use "was started on" to indicate when a process or activity began. For example, "The patient "was started on antibiotics"" or "The project "was started on Monday"".

What are some alternatives to "was started on"?

Alternatives include "was launched on", "was commenced on", or "was initiated on", depending on the context.

Is it better to say "was started on" or "began on"?

"Began on" is simpler and more general. "Was started on" is suitable when you want to emphasize that something was actively initiated or put into motion on a specific date.

What is the difference between "was started on" and "was implemented on"?

"Was started on" is a general term for the beginning of something. "Was implemented on" specifically refers to putting a plan or system into effect, emphasizing practical execution.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: