Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was spent on

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

'was spent on' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when talking about the use of money or time. For example: 'A lot of money was spent on renovating the house.'.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Too much money was spent on one man's home.

News & Media

The Guardian

Nearly £4m was spent on legal services.

News & Media

Independent

How much was spent on silk slippers?

News & Media

The New Yorker

Much more was spent on foreign aid.

News & Media

The Economist

His childhood was spent on the move.

£3m was spent on advertising.

How much was spent on military?

News & Media

The New York Times

At least £9bn was spent on something.

Some $350,000 was spent on carpeting.

News & Media

The New York Times

Only $105.7m was spent on reducing poverty.

News & Media

The Guardian

How much was spent on rebuilding?

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider using stronger verbs if you want to emphasize agency. For example, instead of "money was spent on marketing", try "the company invested heavily in marketing".

Common error

Avoid using "was spent on" when an active voice would be more direct and impactful. For example, instead of saying "time was spent on unnecessary meetings", consider "we wasted time on unnecessary meetings".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was spent on" functions as a passive construction indicating how resources (time, money, effort) were allocated or utilized. As Ludwig AI explains, this phrase is grammatically correct and widely applicable in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

51%

Science

24%

Formal & Business

9%

Less common in

Wiki

7%

Reference

5%

Social Media

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was spent on" is a grammatically correct and versatile phrase used to describe the allocation of resources like time, money, or effort. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase finds frequent use in diverse contexts, especially in news, scientific, and business domains. While it maintains a neutral tone suitable for varied communication, remember to use active voice for more directness when applicable. As evidenced by the examples, this phrase often occurs when detailing how resources were utilized.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "was spent on" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "was allocated to", "was designated for", or "was invested in", depending on the specific context.

What's the difference between "was spent on" and "was invested in"?

"Was spent on" generally implies an expenditure or consumption of resources, while "was invested in" suggests an expectation of future returns or benefits.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "was spent on"?

While "was spent on" is grammatically correct, using the active voice can often make your writing more direct and impactful. For example, instead of "money was spent on advertising", you could say "the company spent money on advertising".

What are some common synonyms for "was spent on"?

Depending on the context, synonyms include "was used for", "was dedicated to", "was consumed by", or "was utilized for".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: