Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was spent on
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
'was spent on' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when talking about the use of money or time. For example: 'A lot of money was spent on renovating the house.'.
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Alternative expressions(5)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Too much money was spent on one man's home.
News & Media
Nearly £4m was spent on legal services.
News & Media
How much was spent on silk slippers?
News & Media
Much more was spent on foreign aid.
News & Media
His childhood was spent on the move.
News & Media
£3m was spent on advertising.
News & Media
How much was spent on military?
News & Media
At least £9bn was spent on something.
News & Media
Some $350,000 was spent on carpeting.
News & Media
Only $105.7m was spent on reducing poverty.
News & Media
How much was spent on rebuilding?
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Consider using stronger verbs if you want to emphasize agency. For example, instead of "money was spent on marketing", try "the company invested heavily in marketing".
Common error
Avoid using "was spent on" when an active voice would be more direct and impactful. For example, instead of saying "time was spent on unnecessary meetings", consider "we wasted time on unnecessary meetings".
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was spent on" functions as a passive construction indicating how resources (time, money, effort) were allocated or utilized. As Ludwig AI explains, this phrase is grammatically correct and widely applicable in various contexts.
Frequent in
News & Media
51%
Science
24%
Formal & Business
9%
Less common in
Wiki
7%
Reference
5%
Social Media
4%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "was spent on" is a grammatically correct and versatile phrase used to describe the allocation of resources like time, money, or effort. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase finds frequent use in diverse contexts, especially in news, scientific, and business domains. While it maintains a neutral tone suitable for varied communication, remember to use active voice for more directness when applicable. As evidenced by the examples, this phrase often occurs when detailing how resources were utilized.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was allocated to
Focuses on the formal assignment of resources, emphasizing planning and distribution.
time was devoted to
Focuses on the allocation of time for a particular purpose or activity.
was dedicated to
Emphasizes commitment and purpose in allocating resources or time.
efforts were focused on
Highlights the concentration of effort towards a specific objective.
was directed towards
Indicates a specific target or aim for the use of resources.
was utilized for
Highlights the practical application and functionality of the resources.
funds were channeled to
Specifically refers to financial resources and their strategic movement.
was invested in
Suggests an expectation of future returns or benefits from the resources used.
resources went into
Emphasizes the commitment of a variety of resources to a task or project.
was consumed by
Implies a complete absorption of resources, often highlighting the extent of use.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "was spent on" to sound more formal?
For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "was allocated to", "was designated for", or "was invested in", depending on the specific context.
What's the difference between "was spent on" and "was invested in"?
"Was spent on" generally implies an expenditure or consumption of resources, while "was invested in" suggests an expectation of future returns or benefits.
Is it better to use active or passive voice with "was spent on"?
While "was spent on" is grammatically correct, using the active voice can often make your writing more direct and impactful. For example, instead of "money was spent on advertising", you could say "the company spent money on advertising".
What are some common synonyms for "was spent on"?
Depending on the context, synonyms include "was used for", "was dedicated to", "was consumed by", or "was utilized for".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested