Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase 'was spend for' is not grammatically correct
The correct phrase would be 'was spent on', as in "The money was spent on groceries."
Similar(60)
And $12,800 was spent for two pools to cool bears and tigers at Zawra Park Zoo in Baghdad.
Ludicrously stringent conditions for disbursement meant that little was spent for years.
How much, if any, of the grant was spent for its intended purpose was not clear.
This suggests that the same effort of writing was spent for all tested classes.
Of the $74 million in compensation expense in 2001, an estimated $63 million (85% of staff costs) was spent for players.
Due to the single rupture of 20 feet of pipeline, over $500,000 was spent for the restoration of service (Lee 2002).
While the budget for each episode was around $1.7 million, an extra $400,000 was spent for the finale.
Only 5% of the recorded time was spent for flight movements.
Even if anomalies are correctly verified, extra energy was spent for intra-BAN communication.
we list the percentage of the total running time that was spent for the window construction.
Among the direct care documented, the longest time was spent for 'medical support for psychiatric symptoms' and 'family support'.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com