was significantly more

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was significantly more" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to compare quantities, qualities, or characteristics, indicating that one is greater than another in a notable way. Example: "The new model was significantly more efficient than the previous version, leading to better performance overall."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"It was significantly more, in fact, than we expected".

The New York Times

That number was significantly more than the reality: Spano was worth roughly $5m.

The Guardian - Sport

What government officials say arrived in Senator Daschle's office was significantly more threatening.

The New York Times

In fact, he says that the US department of defense was significantly more responsive, reading the script within 24 hours.

The Guardian - Film

Acetyl-L-carnitine was significantly more effective than tamoxifen in reducing discomfort and inhibiting the progression of the disease.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

This was significantly more than that of Jpn1 (P < 0.05).

Rice

Conclusion DAD was significantly more frequent in females.

Annals of Intensive Care

Migraine was significantly more prevalent among females compared to males.

The Journal of Headache and Pain

The modified Aβ40 was significantly more toxic than Aβ40.

Journal of Molecular Biology

Conversely, in symptomatic patients, COPD was significantly more frequent.

Lung Cancer

The ELISA was significantly more sensitive than the AGID.

Veterinary Microbiology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

To enhance clarity, specify the units or metrics being compared when using "was significantly more", providing a concrete understanding of the magnitude of the difference.

Common error

Avoid using "was significantly more" without providing sufficient context or data to support the claim. Ensure the difference is truly significant and not just a minor variation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was significantly more" functions as a comparative expression. It quantifies the degree to which one entity exceeds another, using "significantly" to emphasize that the difference is not merely incidental but substantial, as confirmed by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

47%

Wiki

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was significantly more" is a versatile comparative expression used to emphasize a notable difference between two entities. Grammatically correct and frequently employed in both scientific and news-related contexts, it conveys that one quantity or quality substantially exceeds another. Ludwig AI affirms its validity and broad applicability. While alternatives such as "was considerably greater" or "was substantially higher" exist, the choice depends on the desired nuance. To maximize clarity, ensure the context clearly establishes the basis for comparison and the units being measured. Avoid using the phrase without sufficient contextual support to demonstrate the actual significance of the difference.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was considerably greater

Replaces "significantly" with "considerably", indicating a substantial difference.

was substantially higher

Substitutes "significantly more" with "substantially higher", emphasizing a large increase.

was markedly larger

Uses "markedly larger" instead of "significantly more", suggesting a noticeable difference in size.

was notably greater

Replaces "significantly" with "notably", highlighting a difference worth mentioning.

was demonstrably higher

Substitutes "significantly more" with "demonstrably higher", meaning difference can be shown or proven.

was appreciably greater

Uses "appreciably greater" to suggest a difference that is easily perceived or measured.

was distinctly larger

Emphasizes a clear and easily recognizable size difference.

was discernibly higher

Highlights that the difference can be perceived or recognized.

was obviously greater

Replaces "significantly" with "obviously", indicating an easily apparent difference.

was substantially more pronounced

Adds "pronounced" to intensify the difference, highlighting a noticeable and significant effect.

FAQs

How can I use "was significantly more" in a sentence?

Use "was significantly more" to compare two things, showing that one is notably greater than the other. For example, "The new model "was significantly more efficient" than the old one".

What are some alternatives to "was significantly more"?

Alternatives include "was considerably greater", "was substantially higher", or "was markedly larger", depending on the context.

Is it better to say "was significantly more" or "was a lot more"?

"Was significantly more" is more formal and precise, while "was a lot more" is more informal. The best choice depends on the context and your intended audience.

What does it mean when something "was significantly more" than something else?

It means that the difference between the two things being compared is large enough to be noticeable and important. The difference is not just a small or trivial variation.