The OR was significant (OR = 1.01; 95% credibillity interval, 1.01 1.02), although the adjusted spatial pattern in Figure 5B looks very much like the unadjusted one (correlation = 0.98).
In postmenopausal women the association was significant (OR 0.51; 95%CI 0.30-0.88), but not among premenopausal women (OR 0.58; 95%CI 0.25-1.36).
The odds ratio for perforation occurrence from BAOSFE compared to the CAS kit was significant (OR = 0.091, p = .022).022
Because the interaction was significant (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.18, 1.97), we ran separate models for men and women to explore the relationship more completely.
Subgroup analysis showed different patterns of effect in ICU and non-ICU subpopulations: a non-significant difference of effect in the subgroup of ICU patients (OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 0.61 to 2.95; p = 0.46), whereas in the non-ICU patients, the effect was significant (OR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.18 to 2.99; p = 0.01; p for interaction = 0.72).
The odds ratio for treatment (herbivore vs. control) was significant (OR = 2.59, 95% CI = 1.61 to 4.16).
Having seen or heard malaria messages was not significantly associated with ITN ownership (OR = 1.4 [95% CI 1.0 1.9]) while receiving malaria messages at home was significant (OR = 3.1 [95% CI 1.9 5.3]).
This association with meningococcemia cases was significant (OR 5.5, 95% CI 2.4 12.9, p = 0.0001).
In sensitivity analysis including low-potency FGAs, only personality disorder was significant (OR 7.16, p = 0.035).
When adjusted for covariates, oestrogen-only treatment was significant (OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.03 1.74).
Interaction between age and TCS scores on long-term quitting was significant (OR = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.71-0.87) (Model 3).
