was scrutinized

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was scrutinized" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing something that has been examined or analyzed closely, often to assess its quality or validity. Example: "The proposal was scrutinized by the committee before any decisions were made."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Pseudomonas aeruginosa was scrutinized.

Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry

Every detail of appearance was scrutinized.

The New Yorker

But the Navy's presence was scrutinized.

The Washington Post

The situation was scrutinized and no conclusion reached.

The New York Times

The recovered REV heatshield was scrutinized based on the outside aspect and the cross-sections.

Acta Astronautica

The long-term photovoltaic performance of PSCs was scrutinized by probing the operational stability.

Nature

Each was scrutinized because of his obvious or suspected Russian ties.

The New York Times

But after the loan history was scrutinized, the balance turned out to be $60,000.

The New York Times

"Her life was scrutinized and she didn't know how to handle that.

The New York Times - Sports

The 2006 research was scrutinized heavily by Pääbo and Egholm's peers.

MIT Technology Review

Nearly every employee at the American Embassy was scrutinized, no matter how high ranking.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was scrutinized" when you want to emphasize a careful and detailed examination of something, often to identify potential flaws or issues. It implies a more critical and in-depth review than simply "was examined".

Common error

Avoid using "was scrutinized" in very informal or casual writing. While grammatically correct, it can sound overly formal or pretentious in contexts where simpler language would be more appropriate. Consider using "was looked at" or "was checked" instead.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was scrutinized" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that the subject of the sentence underwent a careful and critical examination. Ludwig examples show it used across various contexts to denote detailed inspection. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Science

41%

Wiki

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was scrutinized" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive verb phrase that conveys a careful and critical examination. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in English writing. It is most commonly found in News & Media and Scientific contexts, indicating a neutral to formal register. When choosing an alternative, consider the specific nuance you want to convey, such as "was examined closely" or "was thoroughly investigated". Be mindful of avoiding overuse in very informal settings to maintain an appropriate tone.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was examined closely

Uses a more general term ("examined") and adds "closely" to emphasize the thoroughness.

was carefully inspected

Replaces "scrutinized" with "carefully inspected", highlighting the attention to detail.

was thoroughly investigated

Emphasizes the investigatory aspect of the examination.

was subjected to close analysis

Uses a more formal and academic tone, focusing on analysis.

was put under a magnifying glass

A more figurative expression suggesting intense scrutiny.

was reviewed in detail

Focuses on the reviewing process and the level of detail involved.

was analyzed rigorously

Highlights the rigor and thoroughness of the analysis.

underwent careful assessment

Shifts the focus to the process of assessment and its careful execution.

was closely monitored

Implies ongoing observation and evaluation.

was put through the wringer

An idiomatic expression suggesting a harsh and thorough examination.

FAQs

How can I use "was scrutinized" in a sentence?

"Was scrutinized" indicates that something was examined carefully and critically. For example, "The contract was scrutinized by the lawyers before signing."

What are some alternatives to "was scrutinized"?

You can use alternatives like "was examined closely", "was carefully inspected", or "was thoroughly investigated" depending on the context.

Is it better to use "was scrutinized" or "was examined"?

"Was scrutinized" implies a more critical and detailed examination than "was examined". Use "was scrutinized" when you want to emphasize the thoroughness and critical nature of the review.

What is the difference between "was scrutinized" and "was criticized"?

"Was scrutinized" means to examine something carefully, while "was criticized" means to express disapproval of something. Scrutiny can lead to criticism, but they are not the same thing.