was reviewed from

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was reviewed from" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating the source or basis from which something was reviewed or evaluated. Example: "The report was reviewed from various academic journals to ensure accuracy and comprehensiveness."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Formal & Business

Wiki

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

22 human-written examples

The literature was reviewed from 1979 to 2009, and all systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included in this evaluation.

Seminars in Orthodontics

Moreover, to obtain a wider knowledge on the stability of common pigments, the effect of a variety of parameters was reviewed from literature.

Heritage Science

If data were missing from the computerized chart, the original chart record was reviewed from a second computerized system (OnBase, Hyland Software Inc., Cleveland, OH, USA) which contains the optically scanned paper records from the patient's visit.

International Journal of Emergency Medicine

The play was reviewed from the replay booth, and one second was put back on the clock after the referees determined Yeldon had stepped out of bounds just before time expired.

Wikipedia

This research on wild African elephants was reviewed from an animal welfare perspective by Disney's Animal Care and Welfare Committee, and was approved on December 12 , 2007

Plosone

Clinical information was reviewed from computerised charts.

British Journal of Cancer

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

38 human-written examples

He has now proposed to cut the legal period in which privatisations can be reviewed from ten years to three.

The Economist

References were reviewed from each relevant paper.

European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

These important issues are reviewed from these viewpoints.

Acta Materialia

Thirteen patients with (UTLD) were reviewed from 1999 to 2014.

Insights into Imaging

A total of 61 cases (62.3% male, mean age 44.16 ± 19.17 years) were reviewed from 54 publications.

International Journal of Emergency Medicine

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was reviewed from", ensure the source you are referencing is credible and relevant to the context. This strengthens the validity of your statement.

Common error

Avoid excessive use of passive voice constructions like "was reviewed from", as it can make your writing sound indirect and less engaging. Consider active voice alternatives where appropriate to improve clarity and impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was reviewed from" functions as a passive construction indicating that something has undergone examination or scrutiny, with emphasis on the origin or source of the information used in the evaluation. This is supported by Ludwig's examples, where it is seen used in both academic and general contexts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

67%

News & Media

17%

Formal & Business

16%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was reviewed from" serves to indicate the source of information or perspective used in an evaluation or analysis. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability across various contexts, though it appears more frequently in scientific and formal settings. While alternatives like "was assessed from" or "was evaluated based on" offer similar meanings, "was reviewed from" specifically highlights the source of the review. Thus, using this phrase effectively requires a clear understanding of the intended nuance and appropriate context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was assessed from

Focuses on the act of assessment rather than review, implying a more formal evaluation.

was evaluated based on

Emphasizes the criteria used for evaluation, suggesting a structured process.

was examined from

Highlights a detailed inspection or investigation from a particular viewpoint.

was analyzed from

Implies a systematic and detailed analysis originating from a source.

was inspected from

Suggests a close and careful observation from a given origin.

was considered from

Focuses on the act of taking something into account from a specific perspective.

was derived from

Emphasizes the source from which information or conclusions were drawn.

was obtained from

Highlights where the information or data was acquired.

was gathered from

Stresses the collection of information from a source.

was sourced from

Directly indicates the origin or provider of the information.

FAQs

How can I use "was reviewed from" in a sentence?

You can use "was reviewed from" to indicate that something was assessed or evaluated based on information or documents from a specific source. For example, "The manuscript was reviewed from the perspective of its target audience".

What can I say instead of "was reviewed from"?

Alternatives include "was assessed from", "was evaluated based on", or "was examined from" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Which is correct, "was reviewed from" or "was reviewed by"?

"Was reviewed from" indicates the source of information used in the review, while "was reviewed by" indicates who performed the review. The correct choice depends on the intended meaning.

What's the difference between "was reviewed from" and "was analyzed from"?

"Was reviewed from" suggests a general assessment, while "was analyzed from" implies a more detailed and systematic examination. The choice depends on the depth of the evaluation.