Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was retrieved with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was retrieved with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing the method or tool used to obtain or access something, often in a technical or research context. Example: "The data was retrieved with the latest software update, ensuring accuracy and efficiency."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
24 human-written examples
The hat was retrieved with a bullet hole in it.
News & Media
This segment has an area of 1.5 × 2 km2 and was retrieved with OpenStreetMapsc.
For this outcome, only one small study [40] was retrieved with few events.
Science
In the second nested PCR, only the VHH gene was retrieved with a size of ~400 bp (Fig. 3 lane 1).
Science
Finally, the scalar moment was retrieved with no grid-search procedure, since the problem is linear with respect to the scalar moment.
Science
The VHH repertoire was retrieved with reverse transcription followed by two rounds of nested PCR (Tanha et al. 2002; Fagerlund et al. 2014).
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
34 human-written examples
Performance tests by retrieval simulations show that ice cloud properties are retrieved with high accuracy when cloud optical thickness (COT) is between 0.1 and 10.
Why bother with the stylus when information can be retrieved with a few well-placed pokes?
News & Media
The difference now is that the most intimate personal information is often recorded indelibly and can be retrieved with chilling efficiency by strangers around the globe.
News & Media
Right off the bat we knew nothing, but she taught us how things put into our brains could be retrieved with some degree of reliability.
News & Media
Soldiers were encouraged to make simple wills, stored in their pocket books – often with moving last letters to their families - so they could be retrieved with their bodies if the worst happened.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When describing a research methodology, use "was retrieved with" to clearly indicate the specific tool, database, or technique used to obtain data or information.
Common error
Avoid using "was retrieved with" in everyday conversation or informal writing; it may sound overly formal or stilted. Opt for simpler alternatives like "obtained" or "got" in those contexts.
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was retrieved with" functions as a passive voice construction indicating the means by which something was obtained or accessed. Ludwig shows its prevalence in specifying methodologies.
Frequent in
Science
75%
News & Media
15%
Formal & Business
5%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "was retrieved with" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed construction, particularly in scientific and technical writing, as validated by Ludwig. It serves to specify the method or tool used to obtain data or information, ensuring clarity and precision. While highly appropriate in formal contexts, it may sound stilted in informal settings, where simpler alternatives are preferred. Based on various sources analyzed by Ludwig, this phrase is considered correct and usable in written English, emphasizing its role in detailed methodological descriptions.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was obtained using
Focuses on the method or tool used to get something.
was acquired through
Emphasizes the process or means by which something was gained.
was accessed via
Highlights the pathway or method of accessing information or an object.
was extracted by means of
Suggests a more complex or technical method of obtaining something.
was derived utilizing
Implies that something was obtained as a result of using a specific resource or technique.
was recovered employing
Emphasizes the act of getting something back by employing a certain method.
was gathered through
Indicates a collection process involving a specific method.
was collected with
Similar to gathered, but often implies a more direct or manual process.
was secured via
Focuses on how something was made safe or obtained through a specific channel.
was furnished by
Highlights the source or provider that made something available.
FAQs
How can I use "was retrieved with" in a sentence?
Use "was retrieved with" to specify the method or tool used to obtain data or information, especially in technical or research contexts. For example, "The data was retrieved with a specific algorithm".
What are some alternatives to "was retrieved with"?
You can use alternatives like "was obtained using", "was acquired through", or "was accessed via" depending on the specific context.
Is it appropriate to use "was retrieved with" in informal writing?
While grammatically correct, "was retrieved with" can sound overly formal in informal writing. Consider using simpler alternatives like "obtained", "got", or "found".
What is the difference between "was retrieved with" and "was recovered with"?
"Was retrieved with" generally refers to obtaining something for the first time or from a source. "Was recovered with", on the other hand, implies getting something back that was lost or previously inaccessible.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested