was resulted

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was resulted" is not grammatically correct and should not be used in written English.
Instead, you could use "resulted in" as a verb phrase to show cause and effect. For example: The heavy rain resulted in flooding in the streets.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

This process was resulted in Figure 4.

Security Informatics

The low base saturation in these forest soils was resulted from strong leaching of high precipitation.

Botanical Studies

The pattern was resulted from the interference of the lowest two modes in the waveguide [15].

Nanoscale Research Letters

It was resulted that the resonance frequencies were related to the fluid-flow velocity.

Journal of Theoretical and Applied Physics

Simultaneous recovery of both phosphorus and the potassium was resulted to obtain a solid product.

International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture

The lowest amount of carbohydrates was resulted from the biomass treated with 10M H2SO4.

AMB Express

The statistical significance was resulted from the t-student and chi-square tests.

Intensive Care Medicine Experimental

The second hydroxyl signal was resulted from the reduction of the ketone at C-3.

Chemistry Central Journal

A dendrogram was resulted from the four component contents of the tested samples.

Chemistry Central Journal

This was resulted to the better photocatalytic activity of the coupled system in MB photodegradation.

Journal of Molecular Liquids

The early design of the Malay house was resulted mainly to the responsive climatic.

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing cause and effect, actively use the verb "result" as "resulted in". For example, instead of "the error was resulted from bad code", write "the error resulted from bad code".

Common error

Avoid using the passive construction "was resulted" in your writing. This phrasing is grammatically incorrect. Instead, use the active voice "resulted in" to clearly show the cause-and-effect relationship.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was resulted" functions as a passive construction attempting to convey cause and effect. However, it is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI identifies it as an error, suggesting a more appropriate active voice alternative like "resulted in" for correct usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "was resulted" is frequently encountered, especially in scientific literature as shown by Ludwig, it's crucial to recognize that this is a grammatically incorrect passive construction. The correct way to express the intended meaning—that something led to a specific outcome—is by using the active voice, specifically the phrase "resulted in". This ensures clarity and grammatical accuracy in your writing, which is particularly important in formal and professional contexts. Remember that relying on grammatically sound alternatives like "led to", "caused" or "brought about" will make your writing clearer and more effective. Ludwig AI identifies "was resulted" as an error.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

resulted in

This is the active voice counterpart and a grammatically correct alternative.

caused

A direct and simple way to indicate that one thing brought about another.

led to

This alternative emphasizes the sequence of events, with one action causing another.

brought about

Similar to "caused", but often used for more complex or abstract effects.

produced

This option highlights the creation or generation of something as a result.

gave rise to

This option suggests a more significant or impactful consequence.

stemmed from

This emphasizes the origin or source of something.

was a consequence of

This makes the cause-and-effect relationship explicit and formal.

arose from

Similar to "stemmed from", but suggests a more gradual or natural development.

precipitated

This option implies a sudden or hastened effect.

FAQs

How can I correct the phrase "was resulted"?

The phrase "was resulted" is grammatically incorrect. You can correct it by using the active voice construction "resulted in". For example, change "The problem was resulted from a mistake" to "The problem resulted in a mistake".

Is "was resulted by" grammatically correct?

No, "was resulted by" is not grammatically correct. A better alternative is to rephrase the sentence using the active voice, such as "caused by" or "stemmed from".

What are some alternatives to "was resulted" that I can use in formal writing?

In formal writing, avoid "was resulted". Instead, use more precise phrases such as "led to", "gave rise to", or "brought about".

What is the difference between "was resulted" and "resulted in"?

"Was resulted" is grammatically incorrect. "Resulted in" is the correct and active form. It indicates that something caused a specific outcome. For example, "The experiment resulted in new findings".