was restricted for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was restricted for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something was limited or controlled for a specific purpose or reason. Example: "Access to the confidential files was restricted for security reasons."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

45 human-written examples

The whole of London's airspace was restricted for more than an hour on 12 December, with disruption continuing for several subsequent days.

The Guardian

Even though the space was restricted for an "artisanal" business, Kiehl's, the American beauty products chain, got around the restriction and moved in.

The New York Times - Food

Once the bombing of Afghanistan began Oct. 7, press access to U.S. troops was restricted for months, so that Americans learned about even the war's red-letter events, like the fall of Mazar-i-Sharif, only secondhand.

The New York Times

Recently, Nyad took part in an experiment with a psychiatrist at the University of California San Diego, in which subjects' air supply was restricted for undisclosed intervals and their panic response measured, using MRIs.

The New Yorker

The researchers found that while both slurries provided some cardioprotective benefits, the hearts of rats that had eaten the fresh-crushed garlic had less damage and better recovery after blood flow was restricted for 30 minutes.

The New York Times - Science

1H-NMR results also indicate amorphous chain mobility was restricted for the sample prepared from lower polymer concentration in spite of unchanged crystallinity and relaxation characteristics for crystalline chains.

Polymer

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

15 human-written examples

Emigration is restricted for all Soviet citizens.

The New York Times

"This area is restricted for all of that.

The New York Times

Choices are restricted for people across the world.

The Guardian - Opinion

"Travel continues to be restricted for locals and especially foreigners.

The Guardian

Files concerning student records are restricted for 75 years.

Columbia University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Prefer using "was restricted to" when you want to emphasize that something has specific limits. E.g. "The study was restricted to the years 2000-2009"

Common error

Avoid using "was restricted for" when an active voice construction is more appropriate and direct. Overuse of passive voice can make the writing seem unclear or vague. Always consider the active voice alternative to make the sentence more direct.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was restricted for" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that something experienced a limitation or constraint. This is supported by Ludwig, which confirms its usability in English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

37%

News & Media

29%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was restricted for" is a grammatically correct passive construction used to indicate that something was subject to limitations for a specific reason. Ludwig confirms that it can be used to indicate something has been intentionally limited, controlled, or constrained. The analysis reveals that the expression is commonly used in scientific, news, and academic contexts. While the phrase is generally acceptable, be aware of the potential for overuse of the passive voice, and consider active voice alternatives when appropriate. The reasons for the restrictions should be clear to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives like "was limited to" or "was confined to" can be used depending on the intended nuance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was limited to

Emphasizes a boundary or upper limit.

was confined to

Highlights being kept within specific boundaries or areas.

was earmarked for

Specifies a particular purpose or recipient.

was designated for

Similar to 'earmarked', but implies a more formal assignment.

was intended for

Focuses on the original purpose or design.

was allocated to

Highlights the act of distributing or assigning resources.

was reserved for

Implies something is being kept aside for a specific use.

was curtailed for

Emphasizes a reduction or cutback for a certain reason.

access was limited to

Focuses specifically on limiting access rather than general restriction.

use was limited to

Specifically addresses limiting the usage of something.

FAQs

What does "was restricted for" mean?

The phrase "was restricted for" indicates that something was subject to limitations or constraints for a particular purpose or reason. It implies that access, use, or scope was controlled.

What can I say instead of "was restricted for"?

You can use alternatives like "was limited to", "was confined to", or "was earmarked for" depending on the context.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "was restricted for"?

While "was restricted for" is grammatically correct, consider using the active voice when appropriate for more directness. For example, instead of "Access was restricted for unauthorized personnel", you could write "We restricted access to unauthorized personnel".

How does the meaning of "was restricted for" differ from "was restricted to"?

"Was restricted for" typically indicates the reason for the restriction, whereas "was restricted to" specifies the scope or limit of the restriction. For example, "Access was restricted for security reasons" versus "Access was restricted to authorized personnel".