was repudiated for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was repudiated for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a situation where someone or something was rejected or disavowed due to a specific reason or action. Example: "The proposal was repudiated for its lack of supporting evidence."

✓ Grammatically correct

Wiki

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Boris was born to King Coloman's second wife Euphemia of Kiev after his mother was repudiated for adultery.

Wikipedia

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Mostly, everything he stands for was repudiated resoundingly.

Huffington Post

Zero Dark Thirty was repudiated, Lincoln embraced.

The Guardian - Film

That was not the only time Cheney was repudiated.

The New York Times - Books

But critics argued that the time period could be waived under the exceptional circumstances of a policy being repudiated by the minister responsible for it.

Independent

In 1995, McConnell had a chance to convince the current Supreme Court that the legal debate had shifted so significantly that strict separationism should be repudiated in favor of equal treatment for religion.

The New York Times - Magazine

According to a Los Angeles Times report from 2016 — well after the Sacklers' playbook for OxyContin had been repudiated by the medical establishment as possibly the main driver of the opioid epidemic — Mundipharma commissioned studies showing that millions of people in these countries suffered from chronic pain.

The New Yorker

Its advances cannot, for now, be repelled but its evil messages can and must be repudiated.

Independent

Who wins if this law is repudiated?

The New York Times

The memos were repudiated by President Obama.

The New York Times

"The wolf's dictionary," he declared, "has been repudiated".

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was repudiated for" when you want to emphasize a formal or strong rejection based on a specific reason. It's suitable for contexts where there's a clear disavowal, often with ethical or moral implications. This construction is more appropriate for formal contexts.

Common error

Avoid using "was repudiated for" in casual conversation or informal writing. Opt for simpler phrases like "was rejected because" or "was turned down due to" in such situations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was repudiated for" functions as a passive verb construction indicating that a subject received rejection or disavowal. According to Ludwig, this typically occurs due to a specific reason or action. In the provided example, it highlights a cause-and-effect relationship where the subject's actions led to their repudiation.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Wiki

33%

Science

33%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was repudiated for" is a formal phrase that signifies a strong rejection or disavowal due to a specific reason. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness, though its usage is relatively rare, appearing primarily in News & Media and Wiki contexts. When writing, it is best to use this phrase in formal contexts and replace it with more casual options such as "was rejected because of" or "was dismissed due to" in informal situations. The phrase carries significant weight, so consider the context and audience when choosing to use it. Ludwig's analysis underscores its function in conveying a clear cause-and-effect relationship where the subject faced repercussions due to identifiable actions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was rejected because of

Focuses on the reason for rejection, similar to the original phrase but uses more common vocabulary.

was disavowed due to

Highlights a formal disavowal, implying a deliberate act of rejection.

was condemned for

Emphasizes strong disapproval and moral judgment.

was renounced because of

Suggests a formal and often public rejection of a belief or association.

was dismissed on account of

Indicates a rejection based on a specific reason or factor.

was invalidated by

Focuses on the action that caused invalidation or nullification.

faced condemnation for

Highlights the experience of being condemned, shifting the focus to the subject.

was ostracized as a result of

Implies social exclusion due to a specific cause.

was discredited because of

Emphasizes the loss of credibility as a consequence of something.

was censured due to

Suggests a formal reprimand or expression of disapproval.

FAQs

How can I use "was repudiated for" in a sentence?

Use "was repudiated for" to indicate that someone or something was rejected due to a specific reason or action. For example: "The proposal was repudiated for its lack of supporting evidence."

What can I say instead of "was repudiated for"?

You can use alternatives like "was rejected because of", "was disavowed due to", or "was condemned for" depending on the context.

When is it appropriate to use "was repudiated for"?

It is appropriate to use "was repudiated for" in formal writing or when you want to emphasize the strong rejection of someone or something. It suggests a formal and often public rejection based on ethical or moral grounds.

Is "was repudiated for" more formal than "was rejected for"?

Yes, "was repudiated for" is generally more formal and implies a stronger sense of disapproval or disavowal compared to the more neutral phrase "was rejected for".