was reproduced

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was reproduced" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to something that has been copied or duplicated, often in the context of art, literature, or scientific data. Example: "The original painting was reproduced in a limited edition print for art enthusiasts."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The assay was reproduced three times with similar results.

Nature

And the man's own signature was reproduced beneath the demand.

The New York Times

Each experiment was reproduced at least once in the laboratory.

Nature

Panel (A E) was reproduced from Fig. 1A E in44; Panel (F H) was reproduced from Fig. 2 in45.

Nature

(It was reproduced in the 1989 revue "Jerome Robbins' Broadway").

The New York Times

It was reproduced in newspapers and magazines across the country.

The New York Times - Books

"It was reproduced in the social environment I was in".

The New Yorker

648-2," was reproduced upside down and in reverse.

The New York Times - Books

The cocktail party was reproduced in miniature in Gary's eyeglasses.

The New Yorker

That exchange, almost to the word, was reproduced in "Frozen".

The New Yorker

The image was reproduced globally as the search began.

The Guardian - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was reproduced" in scientific writing, ensure that you clearly state the conditions under which the reproduction occurred to maintain transparency and reproducibility.

Common error

Avoid using "was reproduced" when you actually mean "was inspired by" or "was influenced by". "Was reproduced" implies a direct copy or replication, not simply a source of inspiration.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was reproduced" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that something underwent a process of replication or duplication. Ludwig AI confirms this with numerous examples demonstrating its use across various domains.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

30%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was reproduced" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed passive verb construction, indicating replication or duplication across various fields. Ludwig AI validates its correctness and common usage, especially within scientific, news, and academic spheres. Alternatives such as ""was replicated"" or "was duplicated" offer nuanced substitutions depending on the specific context. When employing this phrase, ensure accurate representation of direct copying versus mere inspiration.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was replicated

Emphasizes the process of repeating an experiment or study to confirm results.

was duplicated

Highlights the creation of an identical copy of something.

was copied

Focuses on the act of making a reproduction, often in a less formal context.

was recreated

Implies that something was made again, often with some degree of alteration or improvement.

was regenerated

Suggests a process of renewal or restoration to a previous state.

was mirrored

Highlights the creation of a reflection or close resemblance.

was simulated

Implies the use of a model to imitate a real-world process or system.

was imitated

Suggests following a pattern or example, often in an artistic or behavioral context.

was reconstructed

Emphasizes the process of building something again from its component parts.

was echoed

Highlights a resemblance or repetition, often in a figurative sense.

FAQs

How can I use "was reproduced" in a sentence?

Use "was reproduced" to indicate that something has been copied or replicated. For example, "The experiment "was replicated" three times to verify the results."

What can I say instead of "was reproduced"?

You can use alternatives like ""was replicated"", "was duplicated", or "was copied" depending on the context.

Which is correct: "was reproduced" or "has been reproduced"?

Both "was reproduced" and "has been reproduced" are grammatically correct. "Was reproduced" refers to a specific instance in the past, while "has been reproduced" indicates that the action happened at some point in the past and may continue to be reproduced.

What's the difference between "was reproduced" and "was recreated"?

"Was recreated" implies that something was made again, possibly with changes or improvements, while "was reproduced" suggests an exact copy or replication.