was repeated with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was repeated with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing an action where something is reiterated or restated in conjunction with something else. Example: "The announcement was repeated with additional details to ensure everyone understood the changes."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This exercise was repeated with essay questions.

University of California, Berkeley

The process was repeated with the lyrics.

The New York Times - Arts

Each experiment was repeated with a different monoculture.

Nature

The pattern was repeated with other migrant workers.

The Guardian

This procedure was repeated with replacement 10,000 times.

Nature

The interest in presentation was repeated with the bouillabaisse.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

This pattern was repeated with each of Heller's novels.

The Guardian - Books

The pattern was repeated with monotonous regularity in succeeding springs.

The New Yorker

Across northern Syria, the scene was repeated with ruthless efficiency.

The Guardian

The statistical design was repeated with increasing proportions of modifiers.

Food Chemistry

The scan was repeated with the full detector pixel.

Micron

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was repeated with", ensure the context clearly indicates what element is being repeated and what new element is being introduced. This clarifies the purpose and effect of the repetition.

Common error

Avoid using "was repeated with" without specifying what 'it' refers to. This can lead to ambiguity. Always explicitly state the subject of the repetition to maintain clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was repeated with" functions as a passive construction indicating that an action or process occurred again, incorporating a new or modified element. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread use.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

78%

News & Media

15%

Academia

7%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was repeated with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase, particularly in science and news reporting, to indicate the reiteration of an action or process incorporating a new or modified element. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is widely accepted and suitable for formal writing, conveying a sense of iteration for comparison or further exploration. To avoid ambiguity, ensure clarity regarding the subject of repetition.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was replicated with

Focuses on exact duplication for verification or emphasis.

was reproduced with

Emphasizes the act of creating a copy of something using different materials or techniques.

was echoed with

Highlights a similarity or correspondence that reinforces the original action.

was reenacted with

Specifically implies performing an action again, often in a staged or deliberate manner.

was performed again with

Focuses on the act of carrying out a task a second time, often with added elements.

was iterated with

Suggests a cycle of repetition with slight changes or improvements at each step.

was cycled back with

Implies a return to an earlier stage or method, incorporating new aspects.

was run through with

Signifies a process that is executed again from start to finish, potentially with new data.

was gone over with

Focuses on reviewing or rehearsing something, often with the addition of details.

was rehearsed with

Implies a practice session or dry run with the aim of improvement or refinement.

FAQs

How can I use "was repeated with" in a sentence?

Use "was repeated with" to indicate that an action or process occurred again, incorporating a new element or modification. For instance, "The experiment was repeated with different variables to test the hypothesis".

What are some alternatives to "was repeated with"?

Alternatives include "was replicated with", "was reproduced with", or "was echoed with depending on the context".

Is it correct to say "was repeated with" in formal writing?

Yes, "was repeated with" is grammatically correct and suitable for formal writing, particularly in scientific or academic contexts where experimental procedures are described.

What is the difference between "was repeated with" and "was replicated with"?

"Was replicated with" implies an exact duplication for verification, whereas "was repeated with" suggests a repetition with some changes or additions. The choice depends on whether the goal is to confirm results or explore variations.