was renumbered to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was renumbered to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something has been assigned a new number or designation, often in contexts like documentation, lists, or systems. Example: "The section in the manual was renumbered to reflect the updated format."

✓ Grammatically correct

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It was renumbered to NY 104B.

Wikipedia

NY 75 was renumbered to NY 430.

Wikipedia

Ten years later, the route was renumbered to Route 16.

Wikipedia

NY 2A was renumbered to NY 15A as a result.

Wikipedia

The original NY 75 was renumbered to NY 430.

Wikipedia

SH-44 was renumbered to SH-74 in 1931.

Wikipedia

In 1927, Route 18S was renumbered to Route 48.

Wikipedia

Route 286 was renumbered to SR 109 in the 1964 renumbering.

Wikipedia

The former routing of NY 72 from Nicholville to Brighton was renumbered to NY 458.

Wikipedia

Between Patterson and NY 22, old NY 39 was renumbered to NY 311.

Wikipedia

In order to avoid a numbering conflict, NY 202 was renumbered to NY 376.

Wikipedia

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was renumbered to" when the primary change is a numerical or alphanumeric designation, not a change in the thing itself.

Common error

Avoid using "was renumbered to" when the change involves more than just a number. For example, if a department's responsibilities change, use "was restructured" or "was reorganized" instead of "was renumbered".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was renumbered to" functions as a passive verb phrase indicating that a subject has undergone a change in its numerical or alphanumeric designation. This is evident from Ludwig's examples where routes, highways, and sections are assigned new numbers.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Wiki

100%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

News & Media

0%

Science

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was renumbered to" is a grammatically sound and common way to express that something has been assigned a new numerical or alphanumeric identifier. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, this phrase is most frequently found in Wiki contexts like Wikipedia articles about roads and routes. While grammatically correct and usable across multiple contexts, ensure the context clearly identifies what is being renumbered and that the change is primarily numerical, rather than a substantive change requiring a different phrasing. Be mindful of other possibilities like "was redesignated as", "was renamed as" for semantic alternatives.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was redesignated as

Focuses on a change in designation, broader than just a number.

was renamed as

Emphasizes a change in the name or label, rather than just a numerical identifier.

was reassigned to

Highlights the action of reassigning something to a different category or label.

was reclassified as

Specifically indicates a change in classification or categorization.

was converted into

Implies a transformation into a new form or type.

was changed to

A more general phrase indicating a simple change, not necessarily related to numbering.

became known as

Shifts the focus to how something is perceived or identified.

was styled

Indicates that the phrase was created in order to look or feel

was labeled as

Emphasizes the act of giving something a label, which could be numerical or otherwise.

was identified as

Highlights the act of identifying or recognizing something under a new name or number.

FAQs

How do I use "was renumbered to" in a sentence?

Use "was renumbered to" when you want to indicate that something has been assigned a new numerical identifier. For example, "Route 66 was renumbered to Route 70".

What can I say instead of "was renumbered to"?

You can use alternatives like "was redesignated as", "was renamed as", or "was reassigned to" depending on the specific context.

When is it appropriate to use "was renumbered to" versus "was renamed to"?

"Was renumbered to" should be used when the identifier is primarily numerical. "Was renamed to" is more appropriate when a name or label changes, regardless of whether it includes numbers.

Is it correct to say "the document was renumbered to version 2.0"?

While understandable, it's more precise to say "the document's version was updated to 2.0" or "the document was revised and assigned version 2.0". "Was renumbered to" usually applies to items in a sequence.