was removed for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was removed for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate the reason or purpose behind the removal of something, often in formal or explanatory contexts. Example: "The document was removed for violating company policy."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

The governor was removed for acting corruptly.

The New York Times

Predictably, the towel was removed for full access.

The New Yorker

He declined and was removed for a pinch-hitter.

The New York Times - Sports

The illustration was removed for violating Facebook's naked breast decree.

The New York Times - Tech

This time, Trachsel was removed for a pinch-hitter and left his fate to his successors.

The New York Times - Sports

When Reed was removed for a pinch-hitter in the seventh, the Mets led, 8-2.

The New York Times - Sports

Martinez remained in the game, but was removed for a pinch-hitter in the third inning.

The New York Times - Sports

He walked in the sixth inning and was removed for a pinch-runner.

The New York Times

Jorge Posada bounced into a forceout at second, and Plesac was removed for Escobar.

The New York Times - Sports

Ukrnafta was liberated, and Kolomoisky's man at UkrTransNafta was removed for good.

The New Yorker

Two years ago, Liu Zhijun, the minister, was removed for corruption and sexual misconduct.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was removed for", ensure that the reason for removal is clearly stated and directly relevant to the context. This helps maintain clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "was removed for" without providing a specific reason. Saying something "was removed for reasons" leaves the reader unclear about the actual cause and weakens the statement's impact. Always specify the reason for removal.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was removed for" functions as a passive construction indicating that something was taken away or eliminated due to a specific reason. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and widespread usage across diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

39%

News & Media

37%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was removed for" is a versatile phrase used to explain the reason behind the removal of something. Grammatically correct and widely accepted, as confirmed by Ludwig AI, it frequently appears in Science and News & Media. To ensure clarity in writing, always specify the reason directly after the phrase. While alternatives exist, "was removed for" remains a concise and effective way to convey causation in both formal and informal contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was taken out because of

This alternative uses a more casual phrasing indicating direct causation.

was eliminated due to

This suggests a more formal or systematic process of removal.

was replaced on account of

This indicates the removal led to a substitution due to a specific reason.

was withdrawn as a result of

Highlights the removal as a direct consequence of something.

was dismissed owing to

Implies a more formal rejection or expulsion because of a stated cause.

was excluded because

Directly states the reason for exclusion.

was ousted as a consequence of

This suggests a forced removal due to specific actions or events.

was superseded following

This implies a replacement or overriding action after a certain event or discovery.

was shelved in light of

Suggests the removal involves deferral or postponement given certain circumstances.

was scrapped because of

This alternative indicates complete termination or abandonment as a result of something.

FAQs

How to use "was removed for" in a sentence?

Use "was removed for" to explain why something was taken away or replaced. For example, "The article was removed for containing inaccurate information."

What can I say instead of "was removed for"?

You can use alternatives like "was taken out because of", "was eliminated due to", or "was replaced on account of depending on the context.

Which is correct, "was removed for" or "got removed for"?

"Was removed for" is generally more formal and grammatically preferred. "Got removed for" is more informal but can be acceptable in casual conversation.

What's the difference between "was removed for" and "was removed because of"?

While both phrases are similar, "was removed for" is slightly more concise. "Was removed because of" explicitly emphasizes causation but can sometimes sound redundant.