Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was relevant to

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was relevant to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something had significance or importance in relation to a particular subject or context. Example: "The research findings were relevant to the ongoing debate about climate change."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The content was relevant to today.

That was relevant to 0.1% of the population.

They were using a sound that was relevant to them.

News & Media

The New York Times

"I wasn't sure it was relevant to us," she said.

News & Media

The New York Times

Although some of the e-mail was relevant to the investigation, most of it was not.

Icac said it did not believe the high court decision was relevant to those appeal proceedings.

News & Media

The Guardian

"I wasn't submitting this evidence because it was relevant to the decision," he said.

News & Media

The Guardian

I had information that I believed was relevant to his inquiry.

News & Media

The Guardian

The Bush campaign said that none of that was relevant to the Bechac family.

News & Media

The New York Times

But I just found it was a different angle and something that was relevant to me.

"We didn't think it was relevant to the AWE offering," Mr. Armstrong said.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Replace "was relevant to" with stronger verbs or more specific adjectives to enhance clarity and impact in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "was relevant to" as a generic placeholder. Instead, specify how something was relevant or use a more descriptive phrase that captures the nature of the relationship.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was relevant to" functions as an adjective phrase followed by a preposition, indicating that something had significance or a connection to a particular topic or context. As Ludwig AI indicates, this phrase is considered grammatically correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

43%

Academia

23%

Science

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

8%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was relevant to" is a grammatically sound and widely used phrase to denote significance or connection within a specific context. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, this phrase is common across various domains, particularly in news, academia, and science. While versatile, it's advisable to ensure clarity by specifying how something is relevant and considering stronger alternatives to enhance your writing. The frequency and authoritative source usage indicate its reliability and acceptance in formal and informal communication.

FAQs

What's a more formal way to say "was relevant to"?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "was pertinent to", "was germane to", or "was applicable to". These options offer a more sophisticated and precise way to express relevance.

How can I use "was relevant to" in a sentence?

Use "was relevant to" to connect a subject to a specific context or situation, indicating that the subject had importance or significance in that context. For example, "The evidence presented was relevant to the case".

What's the difference between "was relevant to" and "was related to"?

"Was relevant to" implies a direct and important connection to the matter at hand, whereas "was related to" simply indicates a connection or association without necessarily implying significance. Relevance suggests importance; relation suggests only a link.

What are some alternatives to "was relevant to" that aren't as formal?

Less formal alternatives include phrases like "was connected to", "had a bearing on", or "mattered to". These options convey a sense of importance or connection in a more casual manner.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: