was related

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was related" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate a connection or association between two subjects in the past. Example: "The research findings were significant because they were related to previous studies on the same topic."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It was not known it was related.

The New York Times

Everything was related to how I play.

Independent

"It was related to tail pricing".

The New York Times

She was related to George Washington and Alexander Hamilton.

The New York Times

"I think I was related to everyone in the audience".

The New York Times

Not all of the lobbying was related to uncontroversial projects.

The New York Times

A spike in 2005 was related to Hurricane Katrina.

The New York Times

"But we think it was related to the letter".

The Guardian

Except, of course, for those boys I was related to.

The New York Times - Magazine

The second was related to puzzles of a different kind.

The Guardian

Not every pitch was related to the headlines.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was related", ensure the relationship you're describing is clear and specific. Avoid ambiguity by providing context about the nature of the connection.

Common error

While "was related" is grammatically sound, overuse can lead to passive constructions. Opt for active voice alternatives when possible to make your writing more direct and engaging.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was related" functions as a linking verb phrase, connecting a subject to a descriptor that indicates a past connection or association. As Ludwig AI illustrates, it's used to establish a relationship between two entities or events.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

39%

News & Media

53%

Wiki

2%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was related" is a versatile phrase used to indicate a past connection or association. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread usage across diverse contexts, particularly in science and news media. While generally neutral in tone, ensure clarity and avoid overusing passive constructions. Consider alternatives like "was connected to" or "was linked to" for nuanced expression.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was connected to

This phrase emphasizes a direct link or association.

was linked to

Similar to 'connected to', but can imply a more causal relationship.

was associated with

Indicates a correlation or common occurrence, not necessarily causal.

was tied to

Suggests a strong connection, often implying dependence.

was pertinent to

Emphasizes the relevance or applicability of one thing to another.

was relevant to

Similar to 'pertinent to', but can also indicate significance.

was in connection with

This phrase is more formal and emphasizes the act of linking.

was in association with

Indicates a more formal relationship or partnership.

had a bearing on

Indicates influence or impact, suggesting a cause-and-effect relationship.

bore upon

A more formal and somewhat archaic way of saying 'had a bearing on'.

FAQs

How can I use "was related" in a sentence?

Use "was related" to show a connection or association between two subjects. For example, "The increase in sales "was related to" the new marketing campaign".

What can I say instead of "was related"?

You can use alternatives like "was connected to", "was linked to", or "was associated with" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "was related to" or "is related to"?

The choice depends on the time frame. Use "was related to" for past events or connections, and "is related to" for present or ongoing relationships.

What's the difference between "was related to" and "was associated with"?

"Was related to" generally implies a direct link or connection, while "was associated with" suggests a correlation or common occurrence, not necessarily causal.