was referred for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was referred for" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It is often used when talking about a person being recommended or directed for a particular purpose or action. Example: The patient was referred for and scheduled to receive further medical testing after experiencing persistent symptoms. In this example, the phrase "was referred for" indicates that the patient was recommended to undergo further medical testing. Other possible ways to use this phrase could be: - He was referred for a job interview at the company. - The case was referred for review by a higher court. - The student was referred for academic counseling due to declining grades. - The proposal was referred for further discussion at the next meeting.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

I was referred for scan after scan.

Independent

He was referred for a possible diagnosis of anorexia nervosa.

The New York Times - Health

I was referred for my position at Thales by an alumna of the Americas program.

Cornell University

My teacher recognised that I was struggling in group situations and I was referred for tests.

The Guardian

A 22-year-old man was referred for continuation of diabetes mellitus treatment.

Nature

In March, the case was referred for mediation by David H. Pikus, a Manhattan lawyer.

The New York Times

A 59-year-old woman was referred for chest and abdominal pain.

Digestive and Liver Disease

Ratzinger didn't go to the police, instead Hullermann was referred for "counselling".

Independent

The proband's family was referred for genetic counseling.

Life Sciences, Society and Policy

A 56-year-old man was referred for tarsorrhaphy to treat a chronic recurrent corneal ulcer.

Duke University

We present a 66-year-old male who was referred for dysphagia.

Surgical Case Reports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was referred for", ensure the context clearly indicates the reason or purpose of the referral. Avoid ambiguity by specifying what the person or case was referred for.

Common error

Avoid using "was referred for" without specifying the specific reason or service. Saying "He was referred" is incomplete; clarify with "He was referred for physiotherapy" to provide clear information.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was referred for" functions as a passive construction indicating that someone or something was directed or recommended to a specific purpose or service. As Ludwig AI highlights, this construction is commonly used in various contexts to denote referral for treatments, evaluations, or other actions.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

48%

News & Media

28%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

9%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was referred for" is a common and grammatically correct construction used to indicate that someone or something has been directed or recommended for a specific purpose or service. As Ludwig AI confirms, it finds wide application across diverse fields, including science, news media, and academia. Common contexts include medical referrals, legal referrals, and professional service referrals. When using the phrase, ensure clarity by specifying the reason or service for the referral. While alternatives such as "was recommended for" and "was directed to" exist, "was referred for" maintains a neutral register suitable for both formal and informal contexts, making it a versatile choice for communicating referral actions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was recommended for

Replaces "referred" with "recommended", emphasizing the suggestion aspect.

was given a referral to

Explicitly mentions the act of giving a referral.

was directed to

Focuses on the act of being instructed or guided.

received a recommendation for

Focuses on receiving a formal recommendation.

was sent to

Highlights the act of sending someone for a particular reason.

was advised to seek

Emphasizes the element of seeking something, such as advice or treatment.

was assigned to

Highlights the act of assigning someone for a particular task.

was designated for

Focuses on designating someone to a specific purpose.

was pointed towards

Implies guidance in a particular direction.

was connected with

Highlights the act of connecting someone with a service or professional.

FAQs

How to use "was referred for" in a sentence?

Use "was referred for" to indicate that someone was directed or recommended to a specific service or purpose. For example, "The patient "was referred for specialist care" after initial assessment".

What can I say instead of "was referred for"?

You can use alternatives like "was recommended for", "was directed to", or "was sent to" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "was referred" without specifying what for?

While grammatically correct, it's better to specify the reason or service for which someone was referred to avoid ambiguity. For instance, instead of "He was referred", say "He "was referred for counseling"".

What's the difference between "was referred for" and "was recommended for"?

"Was referred for" generally implies a more formal direction, often in medical or professional contexts. "Was recommended for" suggests a suggestion or endorsement. The choice depends on the specific context and the nature of the direction.