was referenced to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was referenced to" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct usage would typically be "was referenced" or "was referred to." Example: "The study was referenced in several academic papers discussing climate change."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

On-line, the system was referenced to the left mastoid, and off-line re-referenced to linked mastoids.

Behavioral and Brain Functions

This was referenced to as the base (or original design).

Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering

Each of these variables was referenced to a small watershed boundary.

Fisheries Research

The 27Al chemical shift was referenced to 1 M aqueous Al(NO3 3.

Petroleum Science

Zero pressure was referenced to atmospheric pressure at the mid-axillary line.

Annals of Intensive Care

Performance was referenced to a commercial CoMo/alumina catalyst, Amocat 1A, which was derived from the same blank support.

Catalysis Today

The binding energy (BE) was referenced to Si 2p (BE = 103.5 eV) with an accuracy of ±0.1 eV.

Nanoscale Research Letters

Wind speed was referenced to a height of 10 m (u10) using the algorithm given by Johnson [49].

Carbon Balance and Management

The binding energy (BE) scale was referenced to the C1s line of aliphatic carbon, set at 285.0 eV.

Geochemical Transactions

In addition, the formal standard potential of oxygen reduction was referenced to the cobaltocene/cobaltocenium (Co(cp 2+/0) redox couple.

Electrochimica Acta

Pin-electrodes were used to record the signal: the active electrode was inserted at Oz and was referenced to Fz according to the 10 20 system [34].

The Journal of Headache and Pain

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "was referenced to". Instead, use "was referenced" or "was referred to" for grammatical correctness.

Common error

Do not add the preposition "to" after "was referenced". The correct usage is to say something "was referenced" without the extra preposition, or use "was referred to" which is also grammatically valid.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was referenced to" functions as a passive construction where an item or concept is identified as having a connection to a source or standard. However, Ludwig AI indicates that it's grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "was referenced" or "was referred to".

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

While the phrase "was referenced to" is commonly found, especially in scientific literature as shown by Ludwig, it is considered grammatically incorrect. The correct alternatives are "was referenced" or "was referred to". Despite its frequency, particularly within science, remember to use the accurate form to maintain clarity and credibility in your writing. Ludwig AI flags this phrase as incorrect, so prefer "was referenced" or "was referred to" to ensure grammatical accuracy.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was referred to

Emphasizes a direct mention or citation, similar in meaning but grammatically correct.

was attributed to

Focuses on identifying the origin or cause, implying a connection or source.

was linked to

Highlights a connection or association between two things.

was correlated with

Indicates a statistical relationship or interdependence.

was associated with

Suggests a connection or relationship, not necessarily causal.

was based on

Indicates a foundation or starting point, suggesting derivation.

was grounded in

Implies a deeper, more fundamental connection or origin.

was derived from

Focuses on the source or origin from which something is obtained.

was predicated on

Emphasizes a necessary condition or assumption.

was contingent on

Highlights a dependency or conditionality.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use "referenced" in a sentence?

The correct usage is "was referenced" without the additional "to". For example, "The study was referenced in the report."

Is "was referenced to" grammatically correct?

No, "was referenced to" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. The correct forms are "was referenced" or "was referred to".

What can I say instead of "was referenced to"?

You can use alternatives like "was referenced", "was attributed to", or "was linked to" depending on the context.

What's the difference between "was referenced" and "was referred to"?

"Was referenced" indicates a direct citation or mention. "Was referred to" implies a more general connection or allusion. Both are grammatically correct.