was recognised to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was recognised to" is not correct in standard written English.
It is not a commonly used construction and may lead to confusion in meaning. Example: "He was recognised to have made significant contributions to the field."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

27 human-written examples

The maximum likelihood method was recognised to be the most appropriate for the determination of the multivariate p.d.f. of load cycles.

International Journal of Fatigue

For the preceding two years Blatter let it be known that he supported Johansson, who was recognised to have integrity and to have done a fine, professional job.

The Guardian - Sport

At Westminster he built a team that was recognised to be the best in local government and created a successful consultancy operation providing services to other organisations.

The Guardian

But the ideal of a "manifest destiny" differs from these in its focus not on moral responsibilities but on rights to territory: specifically, territory that was recognised to be that of the indigenous peoples of the continent.

The Guardian - Opinion

By the late 18th century it was recognised to be both a private entity answerable to its shareholders and a public institution closely associated with the state and conscious of responsibilities to the wider financial community.

The Guardian - Books

"I am proud of that; it is an objective fact that, because of what I did, the Bronze Age was established on Alderley Edge, and it was recognised to be the earliest dated metal- working site in England".

Independent

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

33 human-written examples

At the same time, accounting for intangibles is recognised to be inadequate.

Accounting, Organizations and Society

One of the main causes for heavy vehicles rollover is recognised to be cross wind.

Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics

The regulation of metabolism has been recognised to be of central importance in cancer1,2,3.

Nature

A miracle is required to be recognised to pave the way for beatification.

The Guardian

The adequate fire protection of storage vessels to guard against their catastrophic failure is recognised to be of key importance.

Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Instead of using the phrase "was recognised to", opt for stronger and clearer alternatives such as "was acknowledged as" or "was identified as" to improve the readability and correctness of your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "was recognised to" in formal writing; it often results in an unnatural sentence structure. Rephrase the sentence to use a more direct and active voice, enhancing clarity and impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was recognised to" functions as part of a passive voice construction. It aims to convey that something was acknowledged or identified. Ludwig AI notes it is not correct in standard written English. Examples show it frequently precedes a verb, indicating what the subject was acknowledged to be or do.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

41%

News & Media

41%

Wiki

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Academia

4%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "was recognised to" appears in various contexts, including science and news media, it is flagged by Ludwig AI as grammatically incorrect in standard written English. It's recommended to use stronger alternatives such as "was acknowledged as" or "was identified as" for better clarity and grammatical correctness. The phrase attempts to convey acknowledgement or identification but can lead to awkward sentence structures. When aiming for formal or scientific writing, prioritizing its alternatives helps maintain a more polished and professional tone. By using more direct and active voice constructions, you enhance the impact and readability of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was acknowledged as

Emphasizes formal acknowledgement or acceptance, implying official recognition.

was identified as

Focuses on the act of identifying or classifying something or someone.

was considered to be

Highlights a general belief or opinion held by a group or individual.

was deemed to be

Implies a formal judgment or assessment of something's quality or status.

was understood to be

Indicates a shared or common understanding about something.

was known as

Refers to a common name or label by which something or someone is generally known.

was established as

Highlights the act of formally setting up or proving something.

was proven to be

Emphasizes that something has been demonstrated or verified as true.

was thought to be

Indicates a belief or supposition, often without definitive proof.

was accepted as

Highlights the act of receiving or regarding as true or valid.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to "was recognised to"?

You can use alternatives like "was acknowledged as", "was identified as", or "was considered to be" depending on the context.

Is "was recognised to" grammatically correct?

While "was recognised to" is sometimes used, it's not considered standard English. It's better to use more common and grammatically sound alternatives.

How can I use "was recognised to" in a sentence?

It's generally better to rephrase sentences using alternatives. For example, instead of "The issue was recognised to be complex", try "The issue was acknowledged as complex".

What's the difference between "was recognised to" and "was recognised as"?

"Was recognised as" is a more standard and grammatically correct way to express that something was acknowledged or identified in a particular way. "Was recognised to" can sound awkward and is less frequently used.